The Implementation of Notary Inclusive Rights in The Frame of Law Enforcement As a Public Official
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i3.1160Kata Kunci:
Inclusive Rights of Notary, Law Enforcement, Legal Protection, Public Official,Abstrak
This article aims to describe the implementation of a notary’s inclusive rights within the framework of carrying out his duties as a public official. The granting of attribution authority to a notary as a public official is a special assignment that is intentionally made based on laws and regulations with certain roles, functions, and authorities to provide legal services (law enforcement) to the public who need authentic written evidence and the other civil laws authorities, along with inclusive legal protection in the enforcement of duties of a notary. The research method used is juridical normative, in which analyzing a legal event occur and followed by the comparative study between the legal source material and the legal rules that govern it in practice. This study aims to find out what, how, and why the position of a notary is attached to inclusive rights in terms of various legal aspects according to the research topic. The results showed that the form of legal protection that is inclusive of notaries as general officials have been sufficiently regulated in the constitution of the Notary Commission as well as the right to disobey and the obligation to disobey notaries. In addition, the existence of the Notary Honorary Council as a tool for the organization of the Indonesian Notary Association as well as the Notary Supervisory Board and the Notary Honorary Council has strengthened the position of an inclusive notary through preventive measures in the context of fostering and supervising the ethics of notary behavior and the practice of carrying out the duties of the notary commission under the rules in UUJN and UUJN-P.
Unduhan
Referensi
Afifah, Kunni. “Tanggung Jawab Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Secara Perdata Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya.†Jurnal Lex Renaissance 2, no. 1 (January 2017): 147. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol2.iss1.art10.
Anugrah Pakarti, Theo, and Daly Erni. “Jabatan Notaris dan Kode Etik Notaris: Bagaimana Peran dan Fungsi Dewan Kehormatan Notaris?†Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 7 (June 2022): 1663. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2022.v10.i07.p17.
Ardiansyah, Erlan, Mohammad Saleh, and Rahmia Rachman. “Batasan Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Autentik Yang Dibuatnya.†Recital Review 4, no. 2 (June 2022): 432–51. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i2.18867.
Asuan, and Susi Yanuarsi. “Konstribusi Jabatan Notaris dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank.†Solusi 20, no. 3 (2022): 387–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v20i3.706.
Budiansyah, Ahda. “Notary Responsibility Who Has Ended His Tenure on Notary’s Protocol and Deed.†Tanggung Jawab Notaris Yang Telah Berakhir Masa Jabatannya Terhadap Akta Dan Protokol Notaris IV, no. November 2011 (2016): 45.
Edwar, Edwar, Faisal A.Rani, and Dahlan Ali. “Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum Ditinjau Dari Konsep Equality Before The Law.†Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 8, no. 2 (July 2019): 207. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i02.p05.
Kuijpers, N, and B Vollaard. Liberalisation of the Dutch Notary Profession; Reviewing Its Scope and Impact, 2005.
Nola, Luthvi Febryka. “Upaya Pelindungan Hukum Secara Terpadu Bagi Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (Tki).†Negara Hukum 7, no. 1 (2016): 40.
Pandia, Ibreina Saulisa Agitha, M. Fajri Mekka Putra, and Widodo Suryandono.“Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Pelanggaran Jabatan Terkait Kelalaian Notaris Dalam Memenuhi Perjanjian Yang Mengikat Notaris (Studi Kasus: Putusan Majelis Pengawas Pusat Notaris Nomor : 09/B/MPPN/XI/2018).†Indonesian Notary 1, no. 3 (2019): 1–23.
Paramaningrat Manuaba, Ida Bagus, I Wayan Parsa, and I Gusti Ketut Ariawan. “Prinsip Kehati-hatian Notaris dalam Membuat Akta Autentik.†Acta Comitas 3, no. 1 (April 2018): 59. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i01.p05.
Prasetyawati, Betty Ivana, and Paramita Prananingtyas. “Peran Kode Etik Notaris Dalam Membangun Integritas Notaris Di Era 4.0.†Notarius 15, no. 1 (April 2022): 310–23. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i1.46043.
Santiago, Faisal. “Implementation of the Role of Notary through Capital Market in the ERA of Asean Economic Community.†International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 8, no. 8 (2017): 1054–59.
Sholikhah, Entin, and Jawade Hafidz. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Jabatan Notaris Yang Diduga Melakukan Malpraktek Dalam Proses Pembuatan Akta Otentik.†Jurnal Akta 4, no. 1 (March 2017): 47. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i1.1570.
Trisnomurti, Ria, and I Gusti Bagus Suryawan. “Tugas Dan Fungsi Majelis Pengawas Daerah Dalammenyelenggarakan Pengawasan, Pemeriksaan, Dan Penjatuhan Sanksi Terhadap Notaris.†Jurnal Notariil 2, no. 2 (2017): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.2.2.353.127.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Ikhsan Lubis, Taufik Siregar, Ismail Koto, Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo, Duma Indah Sari Lubis
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)
