The Challenge of Admitting Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure Law

https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i3.1873

Authors

Keywords:

Civil Procedure, Challenge of Admitting, Electronic Evidence

Abstract

In the digital age, the use of electronic evidence in civil disputes has become increasingly common. However, judges often face significant challenges in accepting and evaluating electronic evidence due to concerns about its authenticity, integrity, and relevance. This paper examines the factors contributing to judicial doubts regarding electronic evidence in Indonesian civil litigation and explores the implications of such doubts on the resolution of legal disputes. Drawing on case law, legal theory, and practical challenges, the paper identifies key issues such as the ease of manipulation, lack of standardized procedures for collecting and preserving digital evidence, and the limited understanding of technology among many judges. These factors create a significant barrier to the effective use of electronic evidence in court, leading to delays, case dismissals, or unjust outcomes. The paper also discusses potential solutions to overcome these challenges, including the need for clearer legal frameworks, the role of forensic digital experts, and judicial education in information technology. By addressing these concerns, this paper aims to highlight the critical importance of building trust in electronic evidence, ensuring its proper use in civil dispute resolution, and promoting a more efficient and fair legal process. Ultimately, the study proposes strategies to strengthen the role of electronic evidence in Indonesian civil law while maintaining judicial integrity and ensuring the protection of all parties involved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adrianti, Alifa Ramadhani, and Reni Anggraini. “Kekuatan Keterangan Ahli Terhadap Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Perkara Perdata.” Media of Law and Sharia 5, no. 3 (2024): 264-281. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v5i3.109

Afriana, Anita, and Efa Laela Fakhirah. “A fast procedure as an access to justice in order to realize a simple, fast, and low cost principle in Indonesia.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 16, no. 1 (2016): 99-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.1.489

Agus, Azwir. “Embodiment Principles of Clearing Justice in Consumer Arbitration.” Hasanuddin Law Review 4, no. 3 (2018): 383-388. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v4i3.3067

Aime, Andrianantenaina Fanirintsoa, and Zulfikar Dori Ad’ha. “Determination of Legal Remedies for Civil Cases to Make the Principles of Justice Simple, Fast and Lighting Cost.” Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan dan Pranata Sosial 6, no. 1 (2021): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v6i1.10608

Alfikry, Ahmad Habib, Muhammad Riyan Afandi, dan Dian Latifiani. “National Law Development through Civil Procedure Law Reform as a Manifestation of State Goals during the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Lex Scientia Law Review 5, no. 2 (2021): 41–64. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i2.50483.

Alfred, Alfred Yetno, and Ni Made Anggi Arlina Putri. “The Use of Electronic Evidence In Civil Jurisdiction Processes in Indonesian Law Courts.” International Proceeding on Religion, Culture, Law, Education, And Hindu Studies 1 (2022): 157-170.

Amann, Philipp, Mark P. Dillon, and Gerald Quirchmayr. “Challenges to Advanced Electronic Evidence Lifecycle Management in an International Court Environment.” International Conference on Advances in Information Technology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35076-4_4

Amarini, Indriati, Yusuf Saefudin, Ika Ariani Kartini, Marsitiningsih Marsitiningsih, and Noorfajri Ismail. “Digital transformation: creating an effective and efficient court in Indonesia.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 31, no. 2 (2023): 266-284. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.28013

Anggraeni, Ricca. “Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Tantangan Literasi Digital: Strategi Optimalisasi Untuk Pembangunan Hukum Nasional.” Majalah Hukum Nasional 54, no. 2 (2024): 237-258. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v54i2.395

Arshad, Humaira, Aman Bin Jantan, and Oludare Isaac Abiodun. “Digital forensics: Review of issues in scientific validation of digital evidence.” Journal of Information Processing Systems 14, no. 2 (2018): 346-376. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.03.0095

Asimah, Dewi. “Menjawab Kendala Pembuktian Dalam Penerapan Alat Bukti Elektronik: To Overcome the Constraints of Proof in the Application of Electronic Evidence.” Jurnal Hukum PERATUN 3, no. 2 (2020): 97-110. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.322020.97-110

Azizan, Akmal, Sally Sophia, Salma Zahra, and Nurajam Perai. “Optimizing Civil Construction Litigation in Indonesia: A Comprehensive Framework for Efficiency, Expertise, And Equity in Dispute Resolution.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 13, no. 1 (2024): 189-226. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.1.2024.189-226

Budiono, A. R. I. E. F., Wardah Yuspin, Siti Syahida Nurani, Fahmi Fairuzzaman, Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan, and Siska Diana Sari. “The Anglo-Saxon system of common law and the development of the legal system in Indonesia.” WSEAS Transactions on Systems 22, no. 9 (2023): 207-13. https://doi.org/10.37394/23202.2023.22.21

Chan, Peter CH, and Antonio Cabral. “Digitization of judicial procedure: AI, ODR, blockchain and e-justice.” Comparative Civil Procedure (2025): 418-444. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434418.00028

Dewi, Ni Komang Novi Priastuti Puspita, Erikson Sihotang, and Komang Edy Dharma Saputra. “Implementation of Electronic Evidence in Civil Trials at the Denpasar District Court.” Journal of Law, Social Science and Humanities 3, no. 1 (2025): 61-69.

Dolova, M. O., and S. A. Sinitsyn. “Procedural Law and Scientific-Technical Progress: New Opportunities for Pre-Trial Electronic and Remote Interaction of the Parties.” Advances in Research on Russian Business and Management 2022 (2022): 169-189.

Djamaludin, Muhammad Fahruddin Aziz, Yanuriansyah Ar-Rasyid, dan Iskandar Ali As-Sayyis. “Assessing the Impact of Electronic Court Systems on the Efficiency of Judicial Processes in the Era of Digital Transformation.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi 6, no. 1 (27 Juni 2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.8082.

Elmes, Gregory A., George Roedl, and Jamison Conley, eds. Forensic GIS: the role of geospatial technologies for investigating crime and providing evidence. Vol. 11. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8757-4

Fakhriah, Efa Laela. Bukti Elektronik dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perdata. (Bandung: Alumni, 2023).

Fiorella, Giancarlo, Charlotte Godart, and Nick Waters. “Digital integrity: Exploring digital evidence vulnerabilities and mitigation strategies for open source researchers.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 19, no. 1 (2021): 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab022

Gopalan, S. Harihara, S. Akila Suba, C. Ashmithashree, A. Gayathri, and V. Jebin Andrews. “Digital forensics using blockchain.” International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering 8, no. 2 (2019): 182-184. http://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1030.0982S1119

Gronic, Irina A. “On some aspects of case management in electronic courts of Indonesia.” In New Technology for Inclusive and Sustainable Growth: Technological Support, Standards and Commercial Turnover, pp. 193-199. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9808-8_21

Gunarto, G., Y. Yusri, and S. Kusriyah. “Reconstruction of Evidence Regulations in Civil Jurisdiction Based on Justice Value.” Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 6, no. 08 (2023): 447-452. http://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2023.v06i08.008

Handaya Triadi Bambang, Wilfridus, Albertus Joko Santoso, William Juvent, dan Joseph Krishna Spirita Dharma. Forensik Digital Dasar. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2024.

Hamzah, Rosyidi, et al. “Imperfect Information of Bankers Clause in Credit Agreements in Banking Institutions: Further Legal Impact.” Lex Scientia Law Review 7, no. 2 (2023): 529-568.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017).

Haspada, Deny, and Efa Laela Fakhriah. “The Development of Evidence Law in Civil Cases Towards the Unification of Civil Procedural Law.” Yuridika 35, no. 1 (2020): 31-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v35i1.15619

Helmia, R. “The existence of electronic courts (E-court) in realizing simple, fast and low-cost justice.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 8, no. 9 (2019): 270-278.

Hidayat, Imam, Abdul Rachmad Budiono, Budi Santoso, and Rachmi Sulistyarini. “Preparatory Examination in Civil Procedure Law: Strategies for Swift and Efficient Justice.” Indonesia Law Reform Journal 4, no. 2 (2024): 171-198. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v4i2.35691

Howard, Maureen A., and Jeffry C. Barnum. “Bringing Demonstrative Evidence in from the Cold: The Academy’s Role in Developing Model Rules.” Temple Law Review 88 (2016): 513.

Ismail, Dian Ekawaty, et al. “Cyber Harassment of Public Figures: Causes and Importance of Legal Education.” E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 594. EDP Sciences, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459403005

Jayadi, Hendri. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Ahli Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia.” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, no. 2 (2023): 1815-1822.

Khusniyah, Nurul Khotimatul, and Widayati Widayati. “Implementation of Signature Validity on Electronic Documents in Proof Indonesian Civil Procedure Law.” Law Development Journal 3, no. 4: 767-773. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.4.767-773

Kodek, Georg E. “Modern communications and information technology and the taking of evidence.” In Electronic technology and civil procedure: New paths to justice from around the world, pp. 261-278. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3_13

Kurniawan, M. Beni. “Implementation of electronic trial (e-litigation) on the civil cases in Indonesia court as a legal renewal of civil procedural law.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 9, no. 1 (2020): 43-70. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.43-70

Latifiani, Dian, and Mitha Ratnasari. “The Small Claim Court to Realize the Fast and Simple Principle in Civil Disputes Resolution.” South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law 18, no. 4 (2019): 7-12.

Latifiani, Dian, Baidhowi Baidhowi, Pratama Herry Herlambang, Farkhan Radyafani Winarno, and Ahmad Habiburrahman. “Can Advocates’ Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement Drive Reform in Indonesia’s Modern Justice System?.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5, no. 3 (2024): 913-942. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.12988

Latifiani, Dian, et al. “Reconstruction of E-Court Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 2 (2022): 441-448.

Latifiani, Dian, Yusriyadi Yusriyadi, Agus Sarono, Esmi Warassih Pudjirahayu, Suryo Adi Widigdo, and Nur Arif Nugraha. “Implementation of Simple, Fast and Low-Cost Principles in E-Summons with the E-Court System.” Diponegoro Law Review 8, no. 1 (2023): 107-123. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.8.1.2023.107-123

Lekala, Adv R. “E-mail communication for provisional sentence summons.” Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology 6, no. 3 (2011): 145-151.

Lestari, Sri. “The Legal Certainty for Resolving Consumer and Business Actor Disputes from the Perspective of Social Engineering Justice from Roscoe Pound.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 11, no. 3 (2023): 557–68. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i3.1309.

Lone, Auqib Hamid, and Roohie Naaz Mir. “Forensic-chain: Blockchain based digital forensics chain of custody with PoC in Hyperledger Composer.” Digital Investigation 28 (2019): 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2019.01.002

Losari, Junianto James. “Geography has little impact: a comparative study on the role of judges in Singapore and Indonesia in the taking of evidence in civil proceedings.” Asia Pacific Law Review 32, no. 1 (2024): 190-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2023.2274635

Maulidiyah, Nurfauzah, dan Yustria Novi Satriana. “Eksistensi Digital Evidence dalam Hukum Acara Perdata.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 10, no. 1 (30 Juli 2019). https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2616.

Nguyen, Bich Thao. “Improving Vietnam’s Electronic Evidence Law in the Industry 4.0 Era: Experience from China.” Revista de Direito 16, no. 1 (2024): 01-21. https://doi.org/10.32361/2024160117322

Nowak, Mariusz. “Electronic Evidence in Civil Proceedings on the Background of Comparative Law.” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 33, no. 2 (2024): 223-237. http://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.2.223-237

Nugroho, Dedy Muchti. “The Existence of Electronic Evidence in Verification Law System in Indonesia from the Judge’s Perspective.” PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences). 2017.

Nurlaily, Nurlaily, Agusta R. Minin, and Dinesha Samararatne. “The Substantive Justice in Regional Elections: A Philosophical and Sociological Comparison of Asian, European, and African Countries.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 13, no. 1 (2025): 107-127. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i1.1656

Ontanu, Elena Alina. “Normalising the use of electronic evidence: Bringing technology use into a familiar normative path in civil procedure.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 12, no. 3 (2022): 582-613. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1304

Permana, Wahyu Priyanka Nata. “Reviewing Information and Electronic Transaction Act from a Convention on Cybercrime of 2001.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 12, no. 2 (2021). http://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v12i2.a17679

Pradipa, Arya. “Analisis terhadap Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata Pasca UU ITE dan Perkembangan E-Court.” Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi 2, no. 3 (2025): 191-203. https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v2i3.989

Pratiwi, Sahira Jati, Steven Steven, and Adinda Destaloka Putri Permatasari. “The Application of E-Court as an Effort to Modernize the Justice Administration in Indonesia: Challenges & Problems.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 2, no. 1 (2020): 39-56.

Reiling 1, Dory. “Doing justice with information technology.” Information & Communications Technology Law 15, no. 2 (2006): 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600830600676685

Rosmidah, Indriya Fathni, Supeno, dan Yusuf Sani Abubakar. “Can Electronic Land Rights Registration Help Prevent Land from Mafia Practices?” Jambe Law Journal 7, no. 2 (2024): 539–58. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i2.375.

Salle, Salle, and Wafia Silvi Dhesinta Rini. “Development of artificial intelligence regulations and implications for intellectual property rights protection.” Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Social Justice and Legal Reform 1, no. 1 (2025): 58-77. https://doi.org/10.12345/84zybw16

Santosa, Dewa Gede Giri, and Karell Mawla Ibnu Kamali. “Acquisition and Presentation of Digital Evidence in Criminal Trial in Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 11, no. 2 (2022): 195-218. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.195-218

Sari, Dessi Perdani Yuris Puspita, Handityo Basworo, and Haedah Faradz. “Implementation of Principles is Simple, Fast and Low Cost in the Banyumas District Court Class II.” In 3rd International Conference on Law, Governance, and Social Justice (ICoLGaS 2023), pp. 800-812. Atlantis Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-164-7_73

Sarwadi, Gatot. “The Urgency of Electronic Evidence Validation by Judges in Digital Forensic Examinations.” Ratio Legis Journal 3, no. 1: 1142-1151.

Setiawan, Hafizh Daffa, Mohammed Erhuma, and Amarru Muftie Holish. “E-Court Paradigm Shift: Problems of Legitimacy Mechanisms of Electronic Evidence in State Administrative Procedure Law.” Indonesian State Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 53-74. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v6i1.23143

Setyawan, Vincentius. “The Problems of Proving Electronic Evidence.” Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 11, no. 1 (2022): 73-88. https://doi.org/10.34304/jf.v11i1.62

Setyowati, Retno Kus. “The Conclusive Phase of Civil Case Resolution: Examining Execution and Post-Decision Challenges in Indonesian Civil Procedural Law.” Unnes Law Journal 9, no. 2 (2023): 311-332.

Siddiqi, Muzammil, and Ilyas Ilyas. “The Implementation of Electronic Evidence Presentation in Civil Proceedings.” Genesis Law and Social Sciences 1, no. 1 (2025): 10-15. https://doi.org/10.61975/glass.v1i1.78

Socialista, Tembang Merah Sunny, Arsella Imanda Putri, and Dadang Fernando. “Keabsahan Sertipikat Hak Tanggungan Elektronik dalam Prospek Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah.” Law, Development and Justice Review 8, no. 1 (2025): 20-36. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.20-36

Sutiyoso, Bambang. “Ruang Lingkup dan Aspek-aspek Kebijakari Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 19, no. 20 (2002): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss20.art1.

Suparman, Eman. “Doktrin Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata: Analisis dan Perkembangan Dewasa ini di Indonesia.” Borneo Law Review 2, no. 1 (2018): 37–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35334/bolrev.v2i1.719.

———. “Verplichte Procureurstelling Untuk Peradilan Yang Sederhana, Cepat, Dan Biaya Ringan.” Veritas et Justitia 5, no. 1 (2019): 80–104. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3288.

Sujatmiko, Bambang, and Bambang Soesatyo. “The Urgency of Using Electronic Evidence in Trials as an Effort to Answer the Challenges of Law Enforcement in the Digital Era and Social Media Dynamics.” Asian Journal of Social and Humanities 3, no. 9 (2025): 1604-1613. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i9.567

Sukmaningsih, Dewi. “Role of Documentation and Legal Information Network (JDIH) Efforts in Fulfillment of Human Rights.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 1, no. 2 (2018): 371-376.

Sukmasari, Amelia, Wulanmas Frederik, Merry Elisabeth Kalalo, and Muhammad Herro Soepeno. “Application Of Electronic Evidence as Extension of Legal Civil Evidence Divorce Cases in Indonesia.” International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources 4, no. 1 (2024): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v4i1.95

Sumardiana, Benny, Pujiyono Pujiyono, Irma Cahyaningtyas, and Cahya Wulandari. “Evaluation of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Justice in the Era of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Technology.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 9, no. 2 (2024): 309-332.

Syarifuddin, Syarifuddin, et al. “Reformasi Hukum di Era Digital: Tantangan dan Peluang di Indonesia.” Indonesian Research Journal on Education 4, no. 4 (2024): 3206-3215. https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v4i4.1685

Tamin, Budianto Eldist Daud. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia.” Lex Administratum 6, no. 3 (2018).

Tran, Quynh Anh. “The Admission of Electronic Evidence in Civil and Arbitral Proceedings.” Electronic Evidence in Civil and Commercial Dispute Resolution: A Comparative Perspective of UNCITRAL, the European Union, Germany and Vietnam. (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022), pp. 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18572-4_8

Wahyudi, Johan. “Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Pembuktian di Pengadilan.” Perspektif 17.2 (2012): 118-126. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v17i2.101

Татулич, Ірина. “Electronic evidence as a means of evidence in civil proceedings.” Law Review of KyivUniversity of Law 1 (2020): 215-219.

Zulaeha, Mulyani. “E-Courts in Indonesia: Exploring the opportunities and challenges for justice and advancement to judicial efficiency.” International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences 18, no. 1 (2023): 183-194.

Published

2025-12-25

How to Cite

Adinda, F. A., Rahmawati, E., Suparman, E., Arifin, R., & Ezzerouali, S. (2025). The Challenge of Admitting Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure Law. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 13(3), 656–680. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i3.1873