The Age Threshold for Presidential Nominations in the Perspective of Dignified Justice Theory
Why is there a Mahkamah Keluarga Issue?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i3.1301Keywords:
Dignified Justice, Constitutional Court Decision, Requirements for the President and Vice President.Abstract
The Constitutional Court's decision regarding the age limit for nominations for President and Vice President has caused problems in society, one of which is related to the issue of the existence of a Family Court. This issue arises because juridically there is a logical inconsistency in the Constitutional Court's decision regarding the age limit for nominations for President and Vice President and related to the nomination of the President's children to contest the Presidential and Vice Presidential elections in the 2024 election. This research aims to analyze aspects of the age threshold for Presidential candidacy and The Vice President reviewed the theory of dignified justice along with an analysis of the Family Court issue as a result of the Constitutional Court's decision. This research is normative legal research which also orientates socio-legal aspects to assess the impact of a Constitutional Court Decision. The approach used is a conceptual and statutory approach. The research results confirm that the enigma of the age threshold for presidential candidacy in the perspective of the theory of dignified justice occurs because the Constitutional Court has gone beyond the open legal policy conception where the age threshold for presidential and vice presidential candidacy is actually the domain of the legislative institution as in the open legal policy conception. Judging from the theory of dignified justice, the enigma of the age threshold for presidential candidacy also occurs because the Constitutional Court failed to construct the dimensions of social justice as envisioned in the formulation of Pancasila. MK Decision on the Age of the President and Vice President as part of a legal product certainly has social, political and legal impacts on society. Issues related to the Family Court should be addressed wisely by the Constitutional Court because these issues exist as a form of public concern for the dignity of the Constitutional Court as an institution that protects the constitution.
Downloads
References
Admin Polpum. “MK: Putusan Batas Usia Capres/Cawapres Berlaku Di Pilpres 2024.” polpum.kemendagri.go.id, 2023. https://polpum.kemendagri.go.id/mk-putusan-batas-usia-capres-cawapres-berlaku-di-pilpres-2024/ (Diakses Pada Tanggal 20 Oktober 2023).
Afandi, Fachrizal. “Penelitian Hukum Interdisipliner Reza Banakar: Urgensi Dan Desain Penelitian Sosio-Legal.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 1 (2022): 240.
Ahmad, Junaidi, and Agmar Media. “Penegakan Hukum Kepemiluan Untuk Pemilu Bermartabat.” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli 4, no. 1 (2021): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v4i1.448.
Alinda Hardiantoro, Inten Esti Pratiwi. “Perjalanan Karier Politik Gibran, Dua Tahun Wali Kota Solo Lalu Melesat Jadi Cawapres.” www.kompas.com, 2023. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/10/23/101500865/perjalanan-karier-politik-gibran-dua-tahun-wali-kota-solo-lalu-melesat-jadi?page=all (Diakses Pada Tanggal 22 Oktober 2023).
As-suvi, Ahmad Qiram, and Moh Zainullah. “Sociology of Law in The Perspective of Roscoe Pound and Donald Black and Its Relevance in The Indonesian Context.” PJLS: Peradaban Journal of Law and Society 1, no. 2 (2022): 82–95.
Asa, Agam Ibnu, Misnal Munir, and Rr. Siti Murti Ningsih. “Nonet and Selznick’S Responsive Law Concept in a Historical Philosophy Perspective.” Crepido 3, no. 2 (2021): 96–109. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.3.2.96-109.
Atikah Nurdzakiyyah, Eka Detik Nurwagita, Galuh Putri Maharani Universitas. “Penghapusan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Memperkuat Independensi Hakim Konstitusi Atikah.” Studia Legalia 3, no. 2 (2022): 4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.1987.tb01467.x.
Aulia, Muhammad Zulfa, Bimo Fajar Hantoro, Wawan Sanjaya, and Mahrus Ali. “The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 3 (2023): 423–50. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk3034.
Dicky Eko Prasetio Adam Ilyas Felix Ferdin Bakker. “Membangun Moralitas Dan Hukum Sebagai Integrative Mechanism Di Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Mimbar Keadilan 14, no. 2 (2021): 128–38.
Efendi, A’An, and Fradhana Putra Disantara. “Post Conditionally Unconstitutional of Job Creation Law: Quo Vadis Legal Certainty?” Yuridika 37, no. 2 (2022): 329–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i2.33364.
Fahamsyah, Ermanto, and Fradhana Putra Disantara. “The Dignified Justice Perspective on the Enigma of Health Protocols COVID-19 as a Code of Ethics.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 9, no. 1 (2022): 1–15. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v9i1.17413.
Farisa, Fitria Chusna. “Profil Anwar Usman, Adik Ipar Jokowi Yang Terpilih Kembali Jadi Ketua MK.” indeks.kompas.com, 2023. https://indeks.kompas.com/profile/1644/Fitria.Chusna.Farisa (Diakses Pada Tanggal 21 Oktober 2023).
Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode Dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel. 3rd ed. Yogyakarta: Mira Buana Media, 2020.
Johan, Teuku Saiful Bahri. Hukum Tata Negara Dan Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Tataran Reformasi Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. 1st ed. Sleman: Deepublish, 2018.
Kautsar, Izzy Al, Danang Wahyu Muhammad. “Sistem Hukum Modern Lawrance M. Friedman: Budaya Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Dari Industrial Ke Digital.” Sapienta et Virtus 7, no. 2 (2022): 84–99.
Lobubun, Muslim, Iryana Anwar. “The Impact Of The Special General Election Judiciary On The Authority Of The Constitutional Court.” Caraka Justitia 2, no. 2 (2022): 98.
Michael, T. “General Election and the Study of the Future.” Jurnal Notariil 3, no. 2 (2018): 130–36. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268200581.pdf.
Perludem, ICW, Netgrit, KontraS, P2P BRIN, Pusako. “Tafsir Serampangan, Inkonsistensi Logika, Dan Konflik Kepentingan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Putusan No.90/PUU-XXI/2023.” perludem.org, 2023. https://perludem.org/2023/10/17/tafsir-serampangan-inkonsistensi-logika-dan-konflik-kepentingan-mahkamah-konstitusi-dalam-putusan-no-90-puu-xxi-2023/ (Diakses Pada Tanggal 21 Oktober 2023).
Prasetyo, Teguh. Keadilan Bermartabat Perspektif Teori Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2017.
Prasetyo, Teguh, and Tri Astuti Handayani. “Theory of Dignified Justice as A Legal Foundation of Law Reform in Indonesia.” Surakarta Law and Society Journal 1, no. 1 (2018): 46–54.
Purnamasari, Andi Intan, Sulbadana Sulbadana, Supriyadi Supriyadi, and Aminuddin Kasim. “Redesigning: Handling Of Indonesian Election Violations Abroad To Realizing Quality 2024 Elections.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 17, no. 1 (2023): 75–92. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v17no1.2637.
Sabrina, Dian Fitri, and Rosa Ristawati. “The Implementation of Good Governance In The Presidential Election In Indonesia.” Yuridika 36, no. 2 (2021): 281. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v36i2.21096.
Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam. “Open Legal Policy Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (October 2019): 559. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636.
Suteki. Desain Hukum Di Ruang Sosial. 1st ed. Semarang: Thafa Media, 2013.
Syafei, Muhammad, and Muhammad Rafi Darajati. “Design of General Election in Indonesia.” Law Reform: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 16, no. 1 (2020): 97–111. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i1.30308.
Tanjung, Muhammad Anwar Tanjung, Retno Saraswati, and Lita Tyesta A.L.W. “Constitutional Democracy and National Legal Instruments in Resolving Regional Election Disputes.” Lex Publica 7, no. 1 (2020): 95–109. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.7.1.2020.95-109.
Widodo, Hananto, Dicky Eko Prasetio, and Fradhana Putra Disantara. “Relasi Kekuasaan Antar Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 15, no. 1 (2020): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i1.24554.
Yunni, Imam. “Resmi Jadi Mahkamah Keluarga.” koran.tempo.co, 2023. https://koran.tempo.co/read/editorial/485052/mahkamah-konstitus-menjadi-mahkamah-keluarga (Diakses Pada Tanggal 22 Oktober 2023).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Rinaldy Bima, John Tumba Jacob
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)
