THE FORMULATION POLICY FOR PROSECUTOR’S AUTHORITY WITHIN MONEY LAUNDERING
Abstract
The authority of money laundering case’s prosecutors mentioned in article 68 Law Nr. 8 Year 2010 concerning the prevention and eradication of money laundering. The formulation remains unclear and needs further juridical interpretation. Based on the result of research, it can be concluded that the prosecutor’s authority formulated in article 68 Law Nr. 8 Year 2010 concerning the prevention and eradication of money laundering contains of weaknesses as follow : (1)in indictment making process, (2) in case’s handing over process and (3) in transaction blockaging. The juridical implication that appear is the technical regulation should be dismissed since they are in contrary with higher regulation (Law Nr. 8 Year 2010 concerning the prevention and eradication of money laundering). With regards to this condition, the best future formulation for prosecutor’s authority is appliying Indonesian Criminal Procedure Codification (KUHAP), since it can decrease the authority overlap between District Attorney and Corruption Eradication Commission.Keywords : Formulation, authority, prosecutor.
Downloads
References
Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana, Bandung, PT Citra Aditya Bakti
Ridwan HR, 2011, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Cetakan VII, Jakarta, PT RajaGrafindo Persada,
Teguh Prasetyo & Abdul Halim Barkatullah, 2012, Politik Hukum Pidana : Kajian Kebijakan Kriminalisasi dan Dekriminalisasi, Cetakan III, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar
Soerjono Soekanto, 2004, Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta, PT RajaGrafindo Persana
Satjipto Rahardjo, 2009, Penegakan Hukum (Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis), Yogyakarta,Genta Publishing
Hesti Armiwulan Sochmawardiah, 2013, Diskriminasi Rasial Dalam Hukum HAM : Studi tentang Diskriminasi terhadap Etnis Tionghoa, Cetakan ke I, Yogyakarta, Genta Publishing
Soedikno Mertokusumo, 2012, Teori Hukum, Cetakan II, Yogyakarta, Cahaya Atma Pustaka,
Tolib Setiady, 2010, Pokok-pokok Hukum Penitensier Indonesia, Cetakan I, Bandung, Alfabeta
M. Yahya Harahap, 2014, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Penyidikan dan Penuntutan), Cetakan XV, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika,
Adrian Sutedi, , 2008, Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Cetakan I, Bandung Citra Aditya Bakti
Azis Syamsuddin, 2014, Tindak Pidana Khusus, Cetakan IV, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika
Ivan Yustiavandana Et.All., 2010, Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang di Pasar Modal, Cetakan I, Bogor Ghalia Indonesia
Basuki Minarno, 2010, Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah yang berimplikasi Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Cetakan III, Surabaya, Laksbang Mediatama
Marwan Effendy, 2012, Sistem Peradilan Pidana : Tinjauan Terhadap Beberapa Perkembangan Hukum Pidana, Cetakan I, Jakarta, Referensi
Moh. Hatta, 2009, Beberapa Masalah Penegakan Hukum Pidana Umum dan Pidana Khusus, Cet. I, Yogyakarta, Penerbit Liberty
Muhammad Yusuf Et.All, 2011, Ikhtisar Ketentuan Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Jakarta, The Indonesia Netherlands National Legal Reform Program (NLRP)
Modul E-Learning 3 Anti Pencucian Uang dan Pencegahan Pendanaan Terorisme, Bagian 9 : Penuntutan, Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta, Pusat Pelaporan Analisis dan Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)
