THE INJUSTICE OF DISTRIBUTING MARITAL PROPERTY (HARGA GINI GONO) IN DIVORCE CASES
Abstract
After a divorce happened does not mean the family has completed all are problems, but still leave residual problems such as child marriage ( if have children ) and property acquired during the marriage, property acquired during marriage is still related to what is called the joint property or property known Gono gini, disputed the division of joint property, can generally be described that the dispute resolution division of joint property, the division of matrimonial property ( assets gono gini ) to the wife in a divorce often lead to inequality in various aspects especially in the division of matrimonial property ( assets gono gini ) . Observations did about the value of unfairness in the division of joint property in the Village Suralaga in Suralaga District of East Lombok. Inequities in the division of matrimonial property on divorce post implied from several factors including the cultural ideology of patriarchy is still evolving at this time, but it also inequities in the division of joint property caused by the system of inheritance law on which the decision is still indicated the existence of discrimination against women as the dominant party gets unfairness in the process of division of joint property, this occurs because the shape of the existing policy.Keywords : Injustice , Treasure Gono-Gini and Divorce
Downloads
References
Ahmad Rofik, Drs. MA. Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada. 2000.
Abdul Gani Abdullah. Pengantar Kompilasi Hukum Islam dalam Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta : Gema Insani Press. 1994.
Arikunto, Suharsini. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu pendekatan. Yogyakarta : Rineka Cipta. 1998.
Danim, Sudarman. Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif. Bandung : Pustaka setia. 2002.
Direktorat Jendral Pembinaan dan Kelembagaan Agma Islam, Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Departemen Agama RI. 1997/1998.
Furchan, Afif. Pengantar Metode Kualitatif. Surabaya : 1992.
Gautama, Su1dargo. “Perkembangan Arbitrase Dagang Internasional di Indonesiaâ€. Bandung : PT Eresco. 1989.
Hadikusuma, Hilman. “Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia Menurut: Perundangan Hukum Adat, Hukum Agamaâ€. Bandung : Mandar Maju. 2003.
Hilman Hadi Kusuma, S.H. Hukum Perkawinaan Adat. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti. 1995.
Lexy J. Moleong, Dr. MA. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta : Remaja Rosda Karya. 2002.
Lubis, Sulaikin, et. al. “Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama di Indonesiaâ€. Jakarta : Prenada Media. 2005.
Muhammad, Husein. “Memaknai Keadilan dari Perspektif Islamâ€. Kompas : tanggal 12 November 2007.
Munif, Husnun. Dalam Kultum Magrib. 2003.
Nawawi, H. Handri. Dkk. Instrumen Penelitian di Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta : PT. Gajah Mada University Press. 1994.
Rasjid, S. Piqih Islam. Jakarta : Attariah. 1976.
Ramulyo, Mohd. Idris. “Hukum Perkawinan Islam Suatu Analisis dari Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 dan Kompilasi Hukum Islamâ€. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara. 2003.
Sumiyati, S.H. Hukum Perkawinaan Islam dan Undang-undang Perkawinan (Undang-undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Yogyakarta : Liberty. 1982.
Sugiono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R dan D. Bandung : Alfabeta. 2006.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)