Unqualified Audit Opinions and Their Role in Promoting Transparent, Accountable, and Just Governance Reform

https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i2.1713

Authors

  • Bachrul Amiq Faculty of Law, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Fathul Hamdani Faculty of Law, University of Dr. Soetomo, Indonesia
  • Wahyu Prawesthi Faculty of Law, University of Dr. Soetomo, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Yustino Aribawa Faculty of Law, University of Dr. Soetomo, Indonesia
  • Ildar Begishev Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Kazan Innovative University, Russia

Keywords:

Unqualified, Governance, Transparency, Accountability, Bureaucratic Reform

Abstract

This study examines the effect of the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) audit results with an unqualified opinion (WTP) on efforts to improve clean governance in Indonesia. The WTP opinion shows that the financial statements of government entities have been prepared by applicable accounting standards and regulations. Using a normative legal research approach, this study examines the relevance of the WTP opinion as the main indicator of transparency, accountability, and integrity in state financial management. The results show that the WTP opinion has a positive impact in increasing transparency and accountability, strengthening supervision and efficiency of financial management, reducing the potential for corruption, and building public trust in the government. In addition, the WTP opinion also encourages bureaucratic reform through technology adoption, strengthening human resources, and more effective budget planning. This research emphasizes the importance of WTP opinion as a strategic tool in realizing good and sustainable governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bovens, Mark. “Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework.” European Law Journal 13, no. 4 (2007): 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x.

Davis, James H., F. David Schoorman, and Lex Donaldson. “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management.” The Academy of Management Review 22, no. 1 (1997): 20–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/259223.

Goodhart, C. A. E. “Problems of Monetary Management: The UK Experience.” In Monetary Theory and Practice, 91–121. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_4.

Institute of Internal Auditors. “The IIA’s Three Lines Model: An Update of the Three Lines of Defense.” Florida, 2024.

International Framework for Professional Pronouncements. “ISSAI100: Fundamental Principles of Public Sector Auditing,” 2019. https://www.issai.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/ISSAI-100-Fundamental-Principles-of-Public-Sector-Auditing-1.pdf.

Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, no. 4 (1976): 305–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.

Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83, no. 2 (1977): 340–63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778293.

Olken, Benjamin A. “Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” Journal of Political Economy 115, no. 2 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1086/517935.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. “Gender Budgeting,” 2022. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/gender-budgeting.html.

———. “Integrity in Public Procurement,” 2020. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/integrity-in-public-procurement.html.

Porter, Brenda. “An Empirical Study of the Audit Expectation-Performance Gap.” Accounting and Business Research 24, no. 93 (1993): 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1993.9729463.

Spence, Michael. “Job Market Signaling.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, no. 3 (1973): 355–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010.

Abas. Birokrasi Dan Dinamika Politik Lokal . Yogyakarta: Lontar Mediatama, 2020.

Abimanyu, Anggito, and Andie Megantara. Era Baru Kebijakan Fiskal: Pemikiran, Konsep, Dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2009.

Adinata, Widha, Teguh Puspandoyo, and Mei Ling. “Pengaruh Opini Audit Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Di Daerah.” Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik 8, no. 3 (September 30, 2023): 219–34. doi:10.33105/ITREV.V8I3.566.

Angelina, Junita, David Paul, Elia Saerang, and Jessy D. L. Warongan. “The Influence of Audit Opinion, Characteristics of Regional Head, and Levels of Corruption on Performance of Local Government in Indonesia.” The Contrarian : Finance, Accounting, and Business Research 3, no. 2 (July 26, 2024): 96–112. doi:10.58784/cfabr.160.

Hamdani, Fathul, and Ana Fauzia. “The Authority of the Village Government in the Management of Village Funds during the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 4, no. 1 (April 27, 2022): 195–222. doi:10.15294/ijals.v4i1.53646.

Hendriksen, Eldon S., and Michael F. Van Breda. Accounting Theory. 5th Edition. Pennsylvania: Richard D. Irwin Inc., 1992.

Hidayah, Kemal, Fani Heru Wismono, Mayahayati Kusumaningrum, and Rustan Amarullah. “The Role of Regional Inspectorate of Samarinda City In Maintaining Unqualified Opinion.” Journal Borneo Administrator 15, no. 2 (August 6, 2019): 221–36. doi:10.24258/jba.v15i2.538.

Ihfan, Awaludin Nur. “THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE UNQUALIFIED OPINION BY THE AUDIT BOARD OF INDONESIA AND ANTI ANTI-CORRUPTION ACT.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 8, no. 1 (September 30, 2023): 128–43. doi:10.23920/jbmh.v8i1.1239.

Indonesia, Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik. “Ragam Opini BPK.” Opini BPK, July 13, 2020. https://www.bpk.go.id/news/ragam-opini-bpk.

Majid, Jamaluddin. AKUNTANSI SEKTOR PUBLIK. Cetakan 1. Sulawesi Selatan: CV Berkah Utami, 2019.

Nurhidayati, Sri. “ Pengaruh Desentralisasi Fiskal , Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah Dan Tindak Lanjut Rekomendasi Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK Terhadap Opini Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Di Indonesia.Nurhidayati, Sri.” Universitas Lampung, 2017.

Rizal, Chairul, Supiyandi, and Muhammad Amin. “Perancangan Aplikasi Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa Melalui E-Village Budgeting.” Bulletin of Computer Science Research 3, no. 1 (December 31, 2022): 7–13. doi:10.47065/bulletincsr.v3i1.181.

Sitepu, Andreas Putranta. Transparansi Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah . Pasaman Barat: CV Azka Pustaka, 2022.

Srimranani, Chatarina Endang. “Peranan Pemerintah Kabupaten Klaten Dalam Melaksanakan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Dalam Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Yang Baik.” Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, 2022.

Suryadi, Imam, and Aminatuzzuhro Aminatuzzuhro. “PENGARUH GOOD GOVERNANCE DAN STANDAR AKUNTANSI PEMERINTAH TERHADAP AKUNTABILITAS KEUANGAN DENGAN KOMITMEN ORGANISASI SEBAGAI PEMODERASI.” INCOME 2, no. 2 (December 31, 2021): 86–98. doi:10.38156/akuntansi.v2i2.96.

Susanto, Azwar. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Struktur Pengendalian Resiko Pengembagan . Bandung: Linggar Jaya, 2013.

Syarifudin, Akhmad. “Pengaruh Kompetensi SDM Dan Peran Audit Intern Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Dengan Variabel Intervening Sistem Pengendalian Internal Pemerintah (Studi Empiris Pada Pemkab Kebumen).” Jurnal Fokus Bisnis 14, no. 2 (December 2014).

Widyanti, Rina. “Analisis Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Pengelolaan Dana Desa Pada Nagari Ulakan Kecamatan Ulakan Tapakis,.” Menara Ilmu: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Ilmiah 12, no. 11 (October 25, 2018).

Willis, Brillian, Lanny Kusumawati, and Wafia Silvi Dhesinta Rini. “Keterkaitan Opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian Dari Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Terhadap Prinsip Good Financial Governance.” Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Keagamaan 21, no. 2 (July 31, 2023): 389–405. doi:10.53515/QODIRI.2023.21.2.405-421.

Published

2025-08-25

How to Cite

Amiq, B., Hamdani, F., Prawesthi, W., Aribawa, M. Y., & Begishev, I. (2025). Unqualified Audit Opinions and Their Role in Promoting Transparent, Accountable, and Just Governance Reform. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 13(2), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i2.1713