Balancing The Principles of Non-Refoulment and National Security in The Protection of Refugee Rights: A Legal and Policy Analysis of Refugee Handling in Australia
Keywords:
Australia, Balancing Act, National Security, Protection, RefugeesAbstract
This study examines the delicate balance between the principle of non-refoulement and national security in protecting refugee rights, focusing on Australia’s approach to handling refugees. Non-refoulement, a fundamental principle of international refugee law, prohibits the forced return of individuals to countries where they may face persecution. However, ensuring national security while upholding refugee rights poses challenges, particularly in the face of global migration crises and security concerns. Through a case study of Australia’s refugee policies and practices, this research explores the complexities of navigating between these principles, considering legal frameworks, policy implications, humanitarian considerations, and the impact on refugee lives. The findings contribute to understanding the intricate dynamics of balancing humanitarian obligations with national security imperatives in refugee protection efforts. The findings of this research suggest that no balancing act can be justified by international law. Turn-back measures cannot be used to balance Australia’s international obligations to protect refugees. This will lead to violations of the human rights of asylum seekers who will be returned. The act of turning back is hazardous and has the potential to bring threats and persecution to asylum seekers who are returned to their country of arrival, country of origin, or third countries.
Downloads
References
Adwani, Adwani, Rosmawati Rosmawati, and M. Ya’kub Aiyub Kadir. “The Responsibility in Protecting the Rohingya Refugees in Aceh Province, Indonesia: An International Refugees Law Perspective.” IIUM Law Journal 29, no. (S2) (2021): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v29i(s2).677.
Afriansyah, A., Purnama, H. R., & Putrac, A. K. (. “Asylum Seekers and Refugee Management:(Im) Balance Burden Sharing Case between Indonesia and Australia.” Sriwijaya Law Review 6, no. 1 (2022): 70–100. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1. 1145.pp70-100.
Ahmed, Arif. “Individual Protection versus National Security: A Balancing Test Concerning the Principle of Non-Refoulement.” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) 21, no. 5 (2016): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2105053040.
Anker, Deborah E. “Refugee Law, Gender, and the Human Rights Paradigm.” International Refugee Law 25 (2017): 237–58. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092478-11.
Bruin, Rene, Kees Wouters. “Terrorism and the Non‐derogability of Non‐refoulement.” International Journal of Refugee Law 15, no. 1 (2003): 5–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/15.1.5.
Burke-White, W. W. “Human Rights and National Security: The Strategic Correlation.” Harv. Hum. Rts. J 17 (2004): 249. https://doi.org/https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/hhrj17&div=12&id=&page=.
Cerović, Ines. “Is It Permitted To Strike A Balance Between The Interests Of National Security Of A State And The Rule Of Non-Refoulement In The Context Of Article 3 Of The European Convention Of Human Rights And Fundamental Freedoms?” Strani Pravni Život 4 (2015). https://doi.org/https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=575919.
Costello, C., Foster, M. “Non-Refoulement as Custom and Jus Cogens? Putting the Prohibition to the Test.” In Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015: Jus Cogens: Quo Vadis?, 273–327, 2016. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_10.
D’Angelo, Ellen F. “Non-Refoulement : The Search for a Consistent Interpretation of Article 33.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 42, no. 1 (2009): 279–316. https://doi.org/https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/vantl42&div=9&id=&page=.
Duffy, Aoife. “Expulsion to Face Torture? Non-Refoulement in International Law.” International Journal of Refugee Law 20, no. 3 (2008): 373–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/een022.
Ernawati, Ninin. “The Legal Consequences of the Application of Two Australian Policies as Members of the 1951 Refugee Convention Reviewed from the VCLT 1969.” Jurnal IUS 7, no. 1 (2019).
Fitriyadi, A. A., & Latukau, F. “Diferensiasi Pengungsi Dan Pencari Suaka Dalam Hukum Pengungsi Internasional Dan Hubungannya Dengan Prinsip Non-Refoulement.” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 2 (2020): 120–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5400.
Gartzke, Erik, and Matthew Kroenig. “A Strategic Approach to Nuclear Proliferation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53, no. 2 (2009): 151–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708330039.
Hafrida, H., Herlina, N., & Adamy, Z. “The Protection of Women and Children as Victims of Human Trafficking in Jambi Province.” Jambe Law Review 1, no. 2 (2018): 207–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.1.2.207-230.
Holm, Ingrid. “Non Refoulement and National Security.” Lund University, 2015.
Howie, Emily. “Sri Lankan Boat Migration to Australia: Motivations and Dilemmas.” Economic and Political Weekly 48, no. 35 (2013): 97–104. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/23528760.
Itasari, E. R. “The Role of The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission Of Human Rights In Giving Protection To The Ethics Rohingya Of The Spirit In Southeast Asia.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 8, no. 3 (2020): 569–83. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i3.803.
Kim, Seunghwan. “Non-Refoulement and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: State Sovereignty and Migration Controls at Sea in the European Context.” Leiden Journal of International Law 30, no. 1 (2017): 49–70. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0922156516000625.
Kneebone, Susan, Antje Missbach, and Balawyn Jones. “The False Promise of Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016?” Asian Journal of Law and Society 8, no. 3 (2021): 431–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2021.2.
Li, Hanxiao. “Non-Refoulement and National Security: A Comparative Study of UK, Canada and New Zealand.” Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington), 2014. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.17007880.v1.
Missbach, Antje. “Waiting on the Islands of ‘Stuckedness’. Managing Asylum Seekers in Island Detention Camps in Indonesia from the Late 1970s to the Early 2000s.” ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 6, no. 2 (2013): 281–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4232/10.ASEAS-6.2-4.
Putri, E. A., Wahyuni, W. S., Syaputra, M. Y. A., Paramesvari, A. J., & Pratama, G. A. “Legal Protection of Rohingya Citizens Related to The Conflict in Myanmar.” Jambura Law Review Law Review 5, no. 1 (2023): 60–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v5i1.16722.
Simeon, James C. “What Is the Future of Non-Refoulement in International Refugee Law?” In Handbook Chapter on International Refugee Law, 183–206. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932815.00020.
Soeryabrata, T. H. “Juridical Review of the Refugees in Indonesia from the Human Rights Side and the Private Protection.” In International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020), 271–76. Atlantis Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.055.
Stefanovska, V. “The Principle Of Non-Refoulement And Its Reflection On National Security.” In International Scientific Conference “Security, Political and Legal Challenges of the Modern World, 2018. https://doi.org/https://repository.ukim.mk/bitstream/20.500.12188/21981/1/Conference%20Proceedings%20vol.1%20Bitola%20okt%202018.pdf#page=159.
Sudrajat, T., Jati, B. K. H., & Gupta, C. M. “Questioning Indonesia’s Role in Addressing Rohingya Refugees: A Legal, Humanitarian, and State Responsibility Perspective.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 7, no. 1 (2024): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10506.
Supaat, Dina Imam. “Escaping the Principle of Non-Refoulement.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 2, no. 3 (2013): 86–97. https://doi.org/https://www.ijbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Escaping-The-Principle-Of-Non-Refoulement-Dina-Imam-Supaat.pdf.
Trevisanut, Seline. “The Principle of Non-Refoulement and the de-Territorialization of Border Control at Sea.” Leiden Journal of International Law 27, no. 3 (2014): 661–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156514000259.
Yatani, V. G., Safrin, M., & Wagian, D. “Exclusion of the Principle of Non-Refoulement in Article 33 Paragraph 2 of the 1951 Refuge Convention.” Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law 1, no. 1 (2023): 53–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v1i1.2023.108.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Ria Wierma Putri, Yunita Maya Putri, Ninin Ernawati, Muhammad Havez, Febriyani Sabatira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)
