Enhancing the Competence of Supreme Court Judges Through the Specialization of Judges at the Supreme Court
Keywords:
Judicial Review, Competence, Supreme CourtAbstract
The research aims to analyze the characteristics of judicial reviews carried out by the Supreme Court and efforts to increase the competence of Supreme Court judges through differentiation of judges' expertise in judicial reviews. This research is normative legal research with a conceptual and statutory approach. The results of the research show that the characteristics of the judicial review carried out by the Supreme Court are extensive or broad in nature, not only focusing on and referring to the hierarchy of statutory regulations, but the Supreme Court must first qualify a statutory regulation that is formed based on authority or on the orders of higher statutory regulations. The means to increase the competence of Supreme Court judges through differentiation of judges' expertise in judicial review are necessary so that judges' considerations can be comprehensive and substantive. Differentiation of expertise of Supreme Court judges is oriented towards aspects of special training for judges related to judicial review at the Supreme Court because the characteristics of judicial reviews are testing general and abstract norms, and further differentiation of judges' expertise needs to be optimized in terms of the types and characteristics of the regulations being tested.
Downloads
References
Adam Ilyas, Dicky Eko Prasetio. “Problematika Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Implikasinya.” Konstitusi 19, no. 4 (2022): 807.
Ambarsari, Retno. “Hukum Acara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 2, no. 5 (2022): 607–13.
Andryan, Andryan. “Open Court Principle for The Public in Material Judicial Review Right in The Supreme Court.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 22, no. 3 (2022): 387. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.v22.387-394.
Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Pembaruan Penataan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Suatu Telaah Kelembagaan.” Jember: Universitas Jember, 2022.
Annisa, Sarah Nur. “Konsep Independensi Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori the New Separation of Power Bruce Ackerman.” JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law 2, no. 2 (2021): 226–48. https://doi.org/10.18326/jil.v2i2.226-248.
Arman Tjoneng, Dian Narwastuty. “Judicial Review by the Public Prosecutor After Ratification of Prosecutor ’ s Law in 2021.” Dialogia Iuridica 14, no. 2 (2023): 160–81.
Armia, Muhammad Siddiq, Zahlul Pasha Karim, Huwaida Tengku-Armia, Muhammad Sauqi Bin-Armia, Chairul Fahmi, and Armiadi Musa. “Post Amendment of Judicial Review in Indonesia: Has Judicial Power Distributed Fairly?” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 2 (2022): 525–56. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.56335.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Teori Hierarki Norma Hukum. 1st ed. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2020.
Bulman-Pozen, Jessica, and Miriam Seifter. “Countering the New Election Subversion: The Democracy Principle and the Role of State Courts.” Wisconsin Law Review 2022, no. 5 (2022): 1337–65.
Buriticá-Arango, Esteban. “Judicial Review of Legislation and Tyranny of the Majority: A Critical Analysis of the Judicial Protection of Minorities in Democratic States.” Derecho Del Estado 58, no. 183 (2024): 183–211.
Dicky Eko Prasetio, et.al. “Policy Evaluation of the Imposition of Restrictions on Emergency Community Activities (PPKM) in East Java.” In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2021 (IJCAH 2021), 871–78, 2021.
Dicky Eko Prasetio, Hananto Widodo. “Ius Constituendum Pengujian Formil Dalam Perubahan Konstitusi.” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, no. 1 (2022): 2.
Dio Siaga Putra, Ansorullah, and Mahasiswa. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Agung Dalam Judicial Review Terhadap Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Bawah Undang-Undang.” Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law 2, no. 1 (2022): 53–63.
Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, A’an Efendi. “Pancasila Dalam Teori Jenjang Norma Hukum Hans Kelsen.” Legislasi Indonesia 18, no. 4 (2021): 518.
Fadli, Moh. “Peraturan Delegasi Di Indonesia: Ide Untuk Membangun Kontrol Preventif Terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah.” Malang: Universitas Brawijaya, 2020.
Galuh Nur Hasanah, Dona Budi Kharisma. “Eksistensi Judicial Activism Dalam Praktik Konstitusi Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Souvereignty 1, no. 4 (2022): 739.
Ibrahim, Mohammad. “Does the Indonesian Judicial Review System Need Reform?” Australian Journal of Asian Law 22, no. 1 (2022): 17–33.
Indar, Febrian, Surya Kusuma, Sapto Hermawan, and Ardyllis Alves Soares. “The Potential Of Judicial Review As An Incremental Business Strategy The Emergence Of Sharing Economy And One-Stop Services Application In Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 12, no. 1 (2023): 159–88.
Indra, Mexsasai, Geofani Milthree Saragih, and Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar. “Strength of Constitutional Court Decisions in Judicial Review of the 1945 Constitution in Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 2 (2023): 279–99. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2026.
Kusuma, RM. A.B. Lahirnya Undang-Undang Dasar: Memuat Salinan Dokumen Otentik Oentoek Menyelidiki Oesaha-Oesaha Persiapan Kemerdekaan. 1st ed. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2004.
Lailam, Tanto, and Nita Andrianti. “Legal Policy of Constitutional Complaints in Judicial Review: A Comparison of Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Indonesia.” Bestuur 11, no. 1 (2023): 75–94. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.70052.
Lailam, Tanto, and M. Lutfi Chakim. “A Proposal to Adopt Concrete Judicial Review in Indonesian Constitutional Court: A Study on the German Federal Constitutional Court Experiences.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (2023): 148–71. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n2.a1.
M. Fadly Hasibuan, Iza Rumesten. “Reorientasi Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Berdasarkan Prinsip Supremasi Konstitusi.” Ekspose 22, no. 2 (2023): 42–55.
Mahfud, Muh. Afif. “The Relevance of Ronald Dworkin ’s Theory for Creating Agrarian Justice in Indonesia.” Yustisia 8, no. 3 (2019): 385–99. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v8i3.27386.
Mariner, Wendy K. “Shifting Standards of Judicial Review during the Coronavirus Pandemic in the United States.” German Law Journal 22, no. 6 (2021): 1039–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.51.
Maslul, Syaifullahil. “Judicial Restraint Dalam Pengujian Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Yudisial 15, no. 3 (2023): 385. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i3.496.
Muhammad Fauzan, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar. “Digitalization of Evidence in the Constitutional Court: Opportunities and Requisite.” Veteran Law Review 6, no. 1 (2022): 1–14.
Restrepo, Andrés Fernando Mejía, and Liliana Damaris Pabón Giraldo. “Collective Choice and Dissenting Opinions in Multimember Courts. Elements for Assessing Judicial Reasoning in Courts of Constitutional Decision Making in South America.” Estudios Constitucionales 21, no. 1 (2023): 142–68. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002023000100142.
Rishan, Idul. “Doubting the Impartiality: Constitutional Court Judges and Conflict of Interest.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 12, no. 1 (2022): 92–105. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1058.
Rosenthal, Maoz, Gad Barzilai, and Assaf Meydani. “Judicial Review in a Defective Democracy: Judicial Nominations and Judicial Review in Constitutional Courts.” Journal of Law and Courts 9, no. 1 (2021): 137–57.
Satriawan, Iwan, Farid Sufian Shuaib, Tanto Lailam, Rofi Aulia Rahman, and Devi Seviyana. “A Comparison of Appointment of Supreme Court Justices in Indonesia and Malaysia.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 2 (2022): 633–76. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.60862.
Sethi, Amal. “Sub-Constitutionally Repairing the United States Supreme Court.” Common Law World Review 52, no. 4 (2023): 128–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795231205324.
Tanjung, Muhammad Anwar Tanjung, Retno Saraswati, and Lita Tyesta A.L.W. “Constitutional Democracy and National Legal Instruments in Resolving Regional Election Disputes.” Lex Publica 7, no. 1 (2020): 95–109. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.7.1.2020.95-109.
Watanasukh, Purawich. “When the Minority Overruled the Majority: The Politics of the Constitutional Amendment Regarding the Acquisition of Senators in Thailand in 2013.” Political Science and Public Administration Journal 11, no. 2 (2020): 219–52.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Mustakim, Syafrida Syafrida, Warsito, Masidin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)
