Constitutionality of Simultaneous Extension and Renewal of Land Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i1.1360Keywords:
Constitutionality, Extension, Renewal, Land Rights, National Agrarian LawAbstract
One form of state control is to regulate the granting of land rights, including determining the subject of the right and the duration of a land right. The determination of the period of land rights must pay attention to equality of opportunity and access in acquiring and controlling land so as to create the greatest prosperity of the people as the goal of national agrarian law. This is a normative research that focuses on examining the harmony between regulations so that it uses a statute approach and conceptual approach. Therefore, primary legal materials and secondary legal materials obtained based on literature research are used. The data obtained was then analyzed based on content analysis. In this research, it is found that there are overlapping regulations between the Basic Agrarian Law, Governmental Regulation No. 40 of 1996, Agrarian Minister Regulation No. 18 of 2021 and Government Regulation No. 12 of 2023 regarding the extension and renewal of land rights at the same time. In addition, in reality, the simultaneous extension and renewal of land rights causes several things, namely: (1) legal uncertainty because there are regulations as the basis that collide with each other; (2) inequality and injustice for the community in accessing land; and (3) presents unconstitutionality because basically this policy has violated the Constitutional Court's decision.
Downloads
References
Agnew, John. “Sovereignty Regimes: Territoriality and State Authority in Contemporary World Politics.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95, no. 2 (2005): 437–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x.
Amartya Sen. “What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice ?” The Journal of Philosophy 103, no. 5 (2006): 215–38.
Ananda Prima Yurista. “Implikasi Penafsiran Kembali Hak Menguasai Negara Terhadap Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir Dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil.” Rechtsvinding 5, no. 3 (2016): 339–58.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Ekonomi. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia, 2010.
Ávila, Humberto. Certainty in Law. Vol. 114. Law and Philosophy Library. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33407-3.
Christopher Bennett, Muhammad Ridwansyah, Mia Siscawati, and Matt Sommerville. “Indonesia Land Tenure and Property Rights Assesment: Integrated Land and Resource Governance Task Order Under the Strengthening Tenure and Resource Rights II.” Burlington, 2019.
Dharsana, I Made Pria, Indrasari Kresnadjaja, and I Gusti Agung Jordika Pramanditya. “The Legal Consequences of the Government’S Policy of Attracting Foreign Investors Based on the Omnibus Law.” Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, no. 26 (2022): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.47743/jopafl-2022-26-08.
Dobuzinskis, Laurent. “Non-Welfarism Avant La Lettre: Alfred Fouillée’s Political Economy of Justice.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17, no. 4 (2010): 837–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2010.482998.
Earlene, Felishella, and Benny Djaja. “Implikasi Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Terhadap Ketidaksetaraan Kepemilikan Tanah Melalui Lensa Hak Asasi Manusia.” Tunas Agraria 6, no. 2 (2023): 152–70. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v6i2.223.
Gunnar Folke Schuppert. “A Global History of Ideas in the Language of Law.” In State Authority, 54. Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.05.004.
Guy, James E. Holloway and Donald C. “RETHINKING LOCAL AND STATE AGRICULTURAL LAND USE AND NATURAL RESOURCE POLICIES : COORDINATING PROGRAMS TO ADDRESS THE INTERDEPENDENCY AND COMBINED LOSSES OF FARMS , SOILS , AND FARMLAND.” Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law 5, no. 2 (1990).
Jacoby, H. G., Li, G., & Rozelle, S. “Hazards of Expropriation : Tenure Insecurity and Investment in Rural China Author ( s ): Hanan G . Jacoby , Guo Li and Scott Rozelle Published by : American Economic Association Stable URL : Https://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/3083257 Hazards of Expropriation :” American Economic Review 92, no. 5 (2002): 1420–47.
Koeswahyono, Imam. “Hak Menguasai Negara, Perspektif Indonesia Sebagai Negara Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 38, no. 1 (2008): 58. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol38.no1.165.
Larasati, Rindiana, Retno Saraswati, Lita Tyesta A L W, and Muh Afif. “Construct Integrated Agrarian Reforms Based On Justice.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 14, no. 2 (2020): 909–28.
Mahfud, Muh. Afif. “The Relevance of Ronald Dworkin’S Theory for Creating Agrarian Justice in Indonesia.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 8, no. 3 (2020): 389. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v8i3.27386.
Mahfud, Muh., Ani Purwanti, and Dyah Wijaningsih. “A Critical Appraisal of Agricultural Land Conversion for Land Procurement for the Public Interest and National Strategic Projects.” Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Law, Economics and Governance 1, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-7-2022.2326266.
Mayhew, Robert. “Aristotle on Property.” The Review of Metaphysics 46, no. 4 (1993): 803–31.
Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis. London: SAGE Publication, 1994.
Nagel, Thomas. “John Rawls and Affirmative Action.” The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education 39, no. 39 (2003): 82. https://doi.org/10.2307/3134387.
Nayyar, Deepak. “Discrimination and Justice: Beyond Affirmative Action.” Economic and Political Weekly 46, no. 42 (2011): 52–59.
Noon, Mike. “The Shackled Runner: Time to Rethink Positive Discrimination?” Work, Employment and Society 24, no. 4 (2010): 728–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017010380648.
Notonagoro. Politik Hukum Dan Pembangunan Agraria Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1984.
Putra, Ida Ayu Putu Sri Astiti Padmawati dan Ida Bagus Sudarma. “Konstruksi Hukum Pembentukan Badan Bank Tanah Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Yang Berkeadilan.” Vyavahara Duta 27, no. 2 (2023): 58–66.
Rasuanto, Bur. Keadilan Sosial : Pandangan Deontologis Rawls Dan Habermas (Dua Teori Filsafat Politik Modern). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka, 2005.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Revised. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. https://doi.org/10.29339/pha.1.1.15.
Sadurski, Wojciech. “Commutative, Distributive and Procedural Justice – What Does It Mean, What Does It Matter?” Sydney Law School Research Paper 07, no. 09 (2009).
Safik, Akhmad, and Mira Ewinda. “Pengelolaan Tanah Di Ibu Kota Negara IKN.” Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2023): 50. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v8i2.2307.
Safitri, Myrna A. “Hak Menguasai Negara Di Kawasan Hutan : Beberapa Indikator Menilai Pelaksanaannya.” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, no. 1 (2014): 1–21.
Satjipto Rahardjo. Hukum Dalam Jagat Ketertiban. UKI Press, 2006.
Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. 6th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Thomsen, Frej Klem. “Concept, Principle, and Norm-Equality Before the Law Reconsidered.” Cambridge University 24, no. 2 (2018): 103–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325218000071.
Vinner, Solomon. “Fuller’s Concept of Law and Its Cosmopolitan Aims.” Law and Philosophy 26, no. 1 (2007): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s.
Williams, Howard. “Kant’s Concept of Theory.” The Philosophical Quarterly 27, no. 106 (1977): 32–40.
Yance Arizona. Konstitusionalisme Agraria. Yogyakarta: STPN Press, 2014.
Yuswanto, Yuswanto. “Peran Negara Hukum Indonesia Melindungi Rakyatnya Dalam Menyambut Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (Mea) 2015.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 4 (2015): 571–83. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no4.280.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muh Afif Mahfud, Naufal Hasanuddin Djohan, Muhammad Fahad Malik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)