The existence of 'Urf in the Resolution of Marriage Disputes in Islamic Law: A Living Law Perspective

https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i1.1356

Authors

  • Muhammad Luthfi Muhammadiyah Malang University
  • Yaris Adhial Fajrin Muhammadiyah Malang University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Hasnan Bachtiar Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia

Keywords:

Living Law, Marriaage Disputes, ‘Urf

Abstract

‘Urf or customary law is a law that lives, develops, and is implemented by society. In the practice of marital disputes, people tend to implement customary law, or 'urf, first before resolving them through formal mechanisms regulated in statutory regulations. This research aims to analyze 'urf or customary law in marriage disputes from the living law aspect. This research is normative legal research that prioritizes conceptual and statutory approaches. The research results confirm that the position and existence of 'urf or customary law in marriage disputes is permissible as long as it does not conflict with Islamic law, guarantees benefits, and contributes to the successful implementation of Islamic law. Legal efforts to resolve marriage disputes through 'urf are viewed from a living law perspective because, as a law that applies and its value is appreciated by society, in marriage disputes, the role of 'urf or customary law is important to bring justice to the parties in dispute. Apart from that, legal efforts to resolve marital disputes through 'urf from a living law perspective can also be the first attempt to resolve marital disputes, and if efforts through 'urf or customary law are not successful, then efforts can be made to resolve them through procedures in the KHI and statutory regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Faifi, Syaikh Sulaiman Ahmad Yahya. “Ringkasan Fikih Sunnah Sayyid Sabiq.” Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2009.

Alhamdani, Abdul Kodir. Hukum Harta Bersama Di Indonesia: Analisis Hukum Progresif Dan Kemaslahatan. Purwakarta: Guemedia Group, 2023.

Asrul Hamid, Titi Martini Harahap, Resi Atna Sari Siregar, Syaipuddin Ritonga, Amiruddin. “Sociological Analysis of the Concept of Divorce In Marriage Law in Indonesia.” Journal of Religious, Social and Cultural 1, no. 1 (2022): 42–51.

Astari Nadinne, Fitriani A Sjarif, Surini A Sjarif. “Sengketa Harta Bersama Setelah Terjadinya Perceraian (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1710 K/Pdt/2020).” Indonesian Notary 4, no. 2 (2022): 1108–11011.

Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Friedrich Carl von Savigny Tentang Hukum: Hukum Sebagai Manifestasi Jiwa Bangsa.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (July 2020): 201–36. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.201-236.

Azizah, Aisyatul, and Rosita Risma Yanti. “Pseudo Demokrasi Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat.” Sinda x, no. x (2022): 1–11.

Bukido, Rosdalina, Nurlaila Harun, Edi Gunawan, and Rahman Mantu. “Harmonization of Customary and Islamic Law in the Gama Tradition of the Muslim Mongondow Community of North Sulawesi.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 22, no. 2 (2022): 239–54. https://doi.org/10.18326/IJTIHAD.V22I2.239-254.

Citrawan, Harison. “The ‘Life’ in the Living Law: Law, Emotion and Landscape.” Journal of Contemporary Sociological Issues 1, no. 2 (2021): 124. https://doi.org/10.19184/csi.v1i2.25443.

Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Disantara, Fradhana Putra. “Konsep Pluralisme Hukum Khas Indonesia Sebagai Strategi Menghadapi Era Modernisasi Hukum.” Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam 6, no. 1 (2021): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.35673/ajmpi.v6i1.1129.

Efrilius Kantriburi, Ketut Sudiatmaka, and Komang Febrinayanti Dantes. “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Pembatalan Pernikahan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Ri Nomor 1644 K/Pdt/2020).” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 5, no. 3 (2022): 284–96. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v5i3.51906.

Faisar Ananda, Watni Marpaung. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Islam. 2nd ed. Surabaya: PRENADA MEDIA GROUP, 2018.

Hamdani, Fathul, and Ana Fauzia. “Tradisi Merariq Dalam Kacamata Hukum Adat Dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 6 (2022): 433–47. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i6.245.

Hasballah, Khairuddin, Ridwan Nurdin, Muslim Zainuddin, and Mutiara Fahmi. “Patah Titi and Substitute Heirs: A Study of Legal Pluralism on the Inheritance System in Aceh Community.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 21, no. 2 (2021): 299–324.

Hidayat, Niko Ary. “Sengketa Harta Bersama Pada Kasus Mantan Suami Yang Tidak Memberikan Nafkah Selama Perkawinan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1636 K/Pdt/2018).” Indonesian Notary 4, no. 1 (2022): 449.

J. Efendi, J. Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

Loppies, Imelda J. “Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Adat Perkawinan Suku Biak Di Kampung Yendidori Distrik Yendidori Kabupaten Biak Numfor.” Gema Kampus 14, no. 1 (2019): 2.

Muddin, Muhamad Imam. “Inheritance System Mayorat on the Komering Tribe in Urf Perspective.” Nusantara: Journal Of Law Studies 1, no. 1 (2022): 21–32.

Muttaqin, Zainal. “Formalization of Islamic Law in Indonesia in the Framework of Social Engineering Theory by Roscoe Pound.” El-Mashlahah 11, no. 2 (2021): 97–115. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v11i2.2825.

Muzakkir. “Integrasi Hukum Adat Dalam Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 17, no. 1 (2022): 61–69. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v17i1.5609.

Nariswari, Sekar Langit. “Angka Perceraian Tertinggi Dalam 6 Tahun Terakhir, Banyak Pasangan Hilang Rasa,” 2023.

Nasir, Mohamad Abdun. “Negotiating Muslim Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Integration and Conflict in Islamic Law.” Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 21, no. 2 (2022): 155–86. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v21i2.5436.

Nugroho, I Y. “Pendekatan Ushuliyyah Terhadap Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Nikah Siri: Telaah Pasal 143 RUU Materiil Peradilan Agama Bidang Perkawinan.” Al-Adillah 2, no. 1 (2022): 68–74.

Nurul Hikmah, Gelar Ali Ahmad. Hukum Waris Islam. 1st ed. Surabaya: Unesa University Press, 2017.

Nuryamin, Nuryamin, Diana Farid, Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti, Hendriana Hendriana, and Mohamad Hilal Nu’man. “Putusan Hakim Dalam Menuntaskan Sengketa Perkawinan Poligami Di Indonesia.” Justisi 9, no. 2 (2023): 133–44. https://doi.org/10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v9i2.2303.

Oktaviani, Witia. “Konflik Dan Sengketa Perkawinan Di Kecamatan Kapur IX Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota.” Sakena 6, no. 1 (2021): 72=75.

Prasetio, Dicky Eko. “Inventarisasi Putusan Peradilan Adat Sendi Sebagai Upaya Memperkuat Constitutional Culture Dalam Negara Hukum Pancasila.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 2, no. 3 (2021): 249–73.

Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2008.

Rosyid, Moh, and Lina Kushidayati. “Anticipating Disaster: The ‘Urf Perspective of Rebo Wekasan Ceremony in Kudus, Central Java.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial 17, no. 1 (2022): 91–112. https://doi.org/10.19105/AL-LHKAM.V17I1.5705.

Samsudin, Titin, Zulkarnain Suleman, Zumiyati Sanu Ibrahim, Dedi Sumanto, and Yowan Tamu. “The Change of Adultery Accusation to Continuous Dispute in The Gorontalo Religious Court, Indonesia.” Resmilitaris 12, no. 3 (2022): 3732–42.

Surasa, A, E Herningsih, and N Laela. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perkawinan Melalui Mediasi Sebagai Pencegahan Terjadinya Perceraian.” Khazanah Multidisiplin 3, no. 2 (2022): 165–74.

Turatmiyah, Sri, Joni Emirzon, Annalisa Y, and Haniyatul Husna Binti Md Mohtar. “The Ineffectiveness of Mediation in Divorce Disputes: A Case Study in the Palembang Religious Court.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 55, no. 2 (2022): 351. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1232.

Ubaidillah, Asep. “Review Peran Notaris Dalam Pembagian Harta Gono Gini Pada Proses Perceraian.” Qonuni 2, no. 01 (2022): 43.

Utami, Tiara Setyaranti, Suhermi, and Sasmiar. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama Secara Mediasi.” Zaken 4, no. 1 (2023): 144–62.

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Luthfi, M., Fajrin, Y. A., & Bachtiar, H. (2024). The existence of ’Urf in the Resolution of Marriage Disputes in Islamic Law: A Living Law Perspective. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(1), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i1.1356