Formulation of Online Dispute Resolution in Realizing Fair Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement: A Comparative Study

https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i2.1308

Authors

  • Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Faculty of Law Universitas Udayana
  • Putu Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa Faculty of Law Udayana University, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7648-7420
  • Desak Putu Dewi Kasih Faculty of Law Udayana University, Indonesia
  • Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya Faculty of Law Udayana University, Indonesia
  • Ni Ketut Devi Damayanti Faculty of Law Udayana University, Indonesia

Abstract

Although alternative method exists as stipulated in Article 3 paragraph (1) and Article 4 paragraph (3) of the Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement Law, in fact, the dispute resolution in Indonesia’s industrial relation has been focusing on litigation mechanisms. However, litigation is not the best way to fulfill both disputing parties’ desire for justice as the output is win-lose. As such, alternative method exists, puts forward the ‘win-win’ solution. Nonetheless, the current legal framework only sets the clear rule of the aforementioned alternative method to be conducted in person, despite the global pandemic Covid-19. Accordingly, ODR is established to enable virtual procurement. This article will analyze the conception and benefits of online dispute resolution, its implementation gaps in the context of industrial relations dispute resolution, and its regulatory formulation to gain legitimacy in Indonesian law. Applying normative legal research, this article uses statutory, conceptual and comparative approaches. From the research conducted, it is indicated that online dispute resolution is technically superior as it is simple, fast, and low in cost. Even under the Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement Law, its application is feasible, specifically through mediation and conciliation. In Indonesia, implementation of online dispute resolution is possible by amending the Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement Law, considering the prioritization of alternative dispute resolution based on practices in Cambodia, Spain, and ILO Guidelines, as well as the superiority of online dispute resolution based on practices in the United States and UNCITRAL Technical Notes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Putu Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa, Faculty of Law Udayana University, Indonesia

Faculty of Law Udayana University, Indonesia

References

Abdurrasyid, Priyatna, and Bintan R. Saragih. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Dan Internasional. 2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram Univeristy Press, 2020.

Afriani, Audina, Muhamad Rizal, and Sari Usih Natari. “Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Yang Disebabkan Oleh Hak Atas Upah Lembur Di PT Tirta Investama Kabupaten Langkat Dihubungkan Dengan UU No 2 Tahun 2004.” VISA: Journal of Visions and Ideas 3, no. 3 (2023): 536–44.

Arsalan, Haikal, and Dinda Silviana Putri. “Reformasi Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.” Jurnal HAM 11, no. 1 (2020): 39–49.

Azwar, Muhammad. “Prospek Penerapan Online Dispute Resolution Dalam Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia.” Media Iuris 2, no. 2 (2019): 179–96.

Bakhramova, Mokhinur. “ODR (Online Dispute Resolution) System as a Modern Conflict Resolution: Necessity and Significance.” European Multidisciplinary Journal of Modern Science 4 (n.d.): 443–52.

Chandra, Adel. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Transaksi Elektronik Melalui Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Kaitan Dengan UU Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik No. 11 Tahun 2008.” Jurnal Ilmu Komputer 10, no. 2 (2014).

Harahap, Kasmudin. “The Online Dispute Resolution in Pancasila’s Frame.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 8, no. 2 (2021): 157–71.

Karsona, Agus Mulya, Sherly Ayuna Putri, and Etty Mulyati. “Perspektif Penyelesaian Sengketa Ketenagakerjaan Melalui Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN.” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjajaran 1, no. 2 (2020): 158–71.

Kesek, Sastiono. “STUDI KOMPARASI PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL MELALUI MEDIASI DAN KONSILIASI.” DEDIKASI : Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial, Hukum, Budaya 31, no. 2 (December 11, 2015): 129–39. https://doi.org/10.31293/ddk.v31i2.1466.

Mantili, Rai. “Konsep Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Antara Serikat Pekerja Dengan Perusahaan Melalui Combined Process (Med-Arbitrase).” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 6, no. 1 (2021): 47–65.

Maswandi, Maswandi. “PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN KERJA DI PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL.” Publikauma : Jurnal Administrasi Publik Universitas Medan Area 5, no. 1 (December 4, 2017): 36–42. https://doi.org/10.31289/publika.v5i1.1203.

McDermott, E. Patrick, and Ruth Obar. “The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Mediation Participants Experience in Online Mediation and Comparison to In-Person Mediation,” 2022.

Mustakim. Mekanisme Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Menurut Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2004 (Birparti, Tripartit, Gugatan Ke PHI). Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nasional, n.d.

Pratiwi, Wiwin Budi, and Lia Lestiani. “PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL SELAMA MASA PANDEMI COVID DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA.” Book Chapter 2023, no. 0 (February 23, 2023). http://www.e-journal.janabadra.ac.id/index.php/bookchapter-2023/article/view/2562.

Putri, Sherly Ayuna, Agus Mulya Karsona, and Revi Inayatillah. “Pembaharuan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Ketenagakerjaan Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Berdasarkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Murah Sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 5, no. 2 (2021): 310–27.

Rama, Bagus Gede Ari. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Jasa Keuangan Melalui LAPS-SJK: Perspektif Kepastian Hukum.” International Conference Towards Humanity Justice for Law Enforcement and Dispute Settlement 1, no. 1 (2022): 22–28.

Santoso, Imam Budi. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Wajib Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis (Selisik) 3, no. 1 (2017): 116–26. https://doi.org/10.35814/selisik.v3i1.660.

Schmitz, Amy J., and Martinez Janet. “ODR and Innovation in the United States.” University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, 2021, 1–26.

Sudirawan, Kadek Agus, and Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya. “Konsep Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Berbasis Pemberdayaan Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Buruh Dalam Mencari Keadilan.” Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 3, no. 1 (2017): 17–37.

Sutiyoso, Bambang. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Online Dispute Resolution Dan Pemberlakuannya Di Indonesia.” Mimbar Hukum 20, no. 2 (2008): 229–49.

Tobing, Christina NM. “Menggagas Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Bingkai Ius Constituendum Sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 7, no. 2 (2018): 297–326.

Vargha, Corinne. “Reflections on ILO Experience: How Can The Effectiveness of Dispute Resolution System Be Assessed?” Best Practice in Resolving Employment Disputes in International Organizations by ILO, 2014, 3–10.

Vidal, Sara Pose. “Mediation by Labour Courts in Spain.” Best Practice in Resolving Employment Disputes in International Organizations by ILO, 2014, 19–22.

Wicaksana, Dewa Putu Ade, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Mediasi Online sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 3, no. 2 (September 30, 2021): 177–82. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.3.2.2021.177-182.

Zairudin, Ahmad. “Rekontruksi Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial Dalam Hukum Ketenagakerjaan.” Legal Studies Journal 2, no. 1 (2022): 48–61.

ASEAN. “The ASEAN Strategic Action Plan for Consumer Protection (ASAPCP) 2016-2025: Meeting The Challenges of A People-Centered ASEAN Beyond 2015.” asean.org, 2021. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ASEAN-Strategic-Action-Plan-for-Consumer-Protection-2016-2025-ASAPCP-2025.pdf.

Calliess, Gralf-Peter, and Simon Johannes Heetkamp. “Online Dispute Resolution: Conceptual and Regulatory Framework.” TLI Think! Paper 22/2019, 2019. https://deliverypdf.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=272102114078119016105013023116081105123053024093062045123072082065101087111003081100034017099032020059038030115118069079067071029027003086049104107003098031088088113060062063118079085028070089027085021068025007113005006022078110091079073071094107016005&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE.

Committee, APEC Economic. “APEC Workshop on Enhancing Implementation of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) through The APEC ODR Collaborative Framework and Other Fora Including Courts,” 1–51, 2023.

“New Covid Variants: What to Know About BA.2.86 and EG.5 - The New York Times.” Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/article/covid-variant.html.

Organization, International Labour. “Labour Dispute Systems: Guidelines for Improved Performances.” International Training Centre of the ILO, 2013. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_211468.pdf.

RI, Biro Hukum dan Humas Badan Urusan Administrasi Mahkamah Agung. “Mahkamah Agung: Media Komunikasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.” Perpustakaan Mahkamah Agung RI, 2014.

Published

2024-08-12

How to Cite

Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, Yasa, P. G. A. S., Desak Putu Dewi Kasih, Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya, & Ni Ketut Devi Damayanti. (2024). Formulation of Online Dispute Resolution in Realizing Fair Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement: A Comparative Study. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i2.1308