The Implementation of Actio Pauliana Creditor Law Bankruptcy Boedel Dispute Process to Achieve Substantive Justice

The Implementation of Actio Pauliana Creditor Law Bankruptcy Boedel Dispute Process to Achieve Substantive Justice

Authors

  • Yapiter Marpi Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
  • Pujiyono Pujiyono Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
  • Hari Purwadi Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i3.1305

Keywords:

Actio Pauliana, Boedel Bankruptcy, Substantive Justice

Abstract

This Actio pauliana is actually a lawsuit that substantively attempts to confirm that the debtor's legal actions are declared legally invalid if they harm the creditor. In bankruptcy law, actio pauliana is an important instrument so that substantive justice, especially for creditors, can be implemented optimally. This research aims to analyze the substantive justice aspects of actio pauliana in the field of bankruptcy law. This research is normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual and statutory approaches. The research results confirm that the essence of actio pauliana in bankruptcy disputes is viewed from the aspect of substantive justice, namely that it is aimed at protecting creditor rights, especially when there are debtor legal actions that can harm creditors. Apart from that, Actio Pauliana also emphasizes the restitutive aspect as per the substantive justice concept, namely being able to declare the debtor's actions to have no legal force if the action is detrimental to the debtor and reduces the number of bankruptcy debts as has been determined. In its development, the actio pauliana lawsuit in bankruptcy actually represents the fairness aspect as a manifestation of substantive justice so that in the future the actio pauliana lawsuit will not only represent factual losses, but also include potential losses that directly harm creditors and can be proven fairly and properly

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albertus Hansen Setyabudi, Sylvia Janisriwati, Irta Windra Syahrial. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Dalam Actio Pauliana.” Argumentum 9, no. 1 (2023): 119–27.

Anggara, Bionda Johan, and Warsifah Warsifah. “Penerapan Hukum Kepailitan Dalam Kaitannya Kedudukan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Sebagai Institusi Pengatur Dan Pengawas Perusahaan Asuransi Negara (Contoh Kasus PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya).” JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 5, no. 4 (2022): 1250–59. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i4.555.

Butt, Daniel. “Restitution Post Bellum: Property, Inheritance, and Corrective Justice.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 36, no. 3 (2019): 360.

Eriyanti, Devi, and Fully Handayani Ridwan. “Peranan Notaris Dalam Kepastian Hukum Akta Kuasa Menjual Terhadap Objek Jual Beli Yang Pailitkan.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 253. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4873.

Giyanthi, Putu Indri Sri, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, and Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti. “Status Hukum Harta Perkawinan Jika Terjadi Kepailitan Suami/Istri Tanpa Adanya Perjanjian Kawin.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 3, no. 1 (2022): 37–41. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.3.1.4621.37-41.

Hartati Rismauli, Naeli Umniati. “Diskrepansi Sita Umum Kepailitan Dengan Sita Pidana Dihubungkan Dengan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Yang Mengandung Unsur Pidana.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling 4, no. 5 (2022): 1349–58.

Hasanah, Aida Nur. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pada Gugatan Actio Pauliana.” Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam 9, no. 2 (2022): 26–37. https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v9i2.4574.

I Dewa Gede Atmadja. “Legal Ideology on Social Justice Perspective.” Journal Equity of Law and Governance 1, no. 2 (2021): 158–63. https://doi.org/10.55637/elg.1.2.4345.158-163.

Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto, Wita Setyaningrum. “Providing Judges Decisions Based On Justice That Live In Society (Study Of Living Law In Society).” Komunikasi Hukum 9, no. 1 (2023): 687–703.

Karunia Fitriadi, Khalimi, Mohamad Ismed. “Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Dalam Keadaan Kepailitan Pada Perikatan Utang Piutang.” Cakrawala Ilmiah 1, no. 11 (2022): 2807–12.

Kurniawan, Faizal, Xavier Nugraha, Gio Arjuna Putra, Vicko Taniady, and Bart Jansen. “The Principle of Balance Formulation as the Basis for Cancellation of Agreement in Indonesia.” Lex Scientia Law Review 6, no. 1 (2022): 121–56. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.55468.

Mantili, Rai. “Actio Pauliana Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Bagi Kreditor Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Pkpu).” Adhaper: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 6, no. 2 (2021): 21. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.127.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitiam Hukum. 13th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Oltra Gras, Ignacio. “Online Courts: Bridging the Gap Between Access and Justice.” Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 10, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.2052-1871.1214.

Pahlevi, Rizky Reza, Zulfi Diane Zaini, and Recca Ayu Hapsari. “Analisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatigedaad) Terhadap Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah.” Pagaruyuang Law Journal 5, no. 1 (2021): 18–28. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v5i1.2826.

Panatagama, Alfatra. “Actio Pauliana Dalam Kepailitan Yang Melebihi Jangka Waktu Satu Tahun.” Jurist-Diction 3, no. 4 (2020): 1249. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i4.20205.

Purwanto, P. “Subyek Hukum Korporasi Dalam Permohonan Kepailitan Di Indonesia.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 6, no. 4 (2022): 2231–38. https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i4.3637/http.

Putra, IGKD, and K A Sudiarawan. “Pengaturan Upaya Perdamaian Oleh Debitor Pailit Setelah Adanya Putusan Pernyataan Pailit: Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia.” Acta Comitas 7, no. 1 (2022): 166–78. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ActaComitas/article/download/85662/44375.

Samsul Arifin, Ariza Umami dan Iskandar. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Akibat Adanya Pemberlakuan Actio Pauliana Dalam Hukum Kepailitan.” Justice Law: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (2022): 1–9. http://scholar.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/hukum/index.

Saurmauli, Ruth Irene. “Legal Certainty of Actio Pauliana Decision in Bankruptcy Cases.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 1, no. 7 (2022): 386–93. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v1i7.92.

Shaw, Elizabeth. “Justice Without Moral Responsibility?” Journal of Information Ethics 28, no. 1 (2019).

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Sejarah, Asas, Dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2016.

Tan, David. “Kajian Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia: Studi Putusan Nomor 36/Pdt.Suspailit /2020/ Pn Niaga Jkt.Pst.” Maleo Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2022): 105–16.

Tan, Zhong Xing. “The Proportionality Puzzle in Contract Law: A Challenge for Private Law Theory?” Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 33, no. 1 (2020): 219.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-26

How to Cite

Marpi, Y., Pujiyono, P., & Purwadi, H. (2023). The Implementation of Actio Pauliana Creditor Law Bankruptcy Boedel Dispute Process to Achieve Substantive Justice. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(3), 528–538. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i3.1305

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3: December 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Yapiter Marpi, Puniyono Pujiyono, Hari Purwadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)