Harmonization between Investigators and Advocates in the Law Enforcement Process

https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i1.1174

Authors

  • Rachman Maulana Kafrawi Faculty of Law, Mataram University
  • Mohammad Zamroni Faculty of Law, Hang Tuah University
  • Antonino Pedro Marsal Programa Mestradu, Universidade Oriental Timor-Lorosa’e

Keywords:

Advocates, Harmonization, Investigators, Law Enforcement

Abstract

Law enforcement containing the proportional principle is how law enforcement runs in such a way, so that it does not only enforce the normative rules (aspects of legal certainty) but also the philosophical aspects (aspects and values of justice). Functional differentiation causes law enforcement practices by law enforcement officers to be fragmented and fragmentary because each component of law enforcement has different perceptions and meanings. This has an impact on the difficulty of realizing an integrated and integrated criminal justice system because there are often conflicts of interest and differences in interpretation between law enforcement components so that the products of the judiciary have not been able to meet the expectations of the people seeking justice. So in this systematic framework, the actions of one body will affect the other bodies. Research purposes namely analyzing the harmonization between investigators and advocates in the law enforcement process and analyzing the harmonization and synchronization between law enforcers. The research method in this case combines elements of normative law which are then supported by additional data or empirical elements. The system in the criminal justice system so that in practice it will have an effect on the implementation of the criminal justice system as a whole.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andreae, Sybandrus Johannes Fockema, Nikolaas Egbert Algra, and H R W Gokkel. Kamus Istilah Hukum Fockema Andreae: Belanda-Indonesia. Binacipta, 1983.

Anwar, Yesmil. “Adang, Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Konsep, Komponen, Dan Pelaksanaannya Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Bandung: Widya Padjajaran, 2009.

Apeldroon, L.j. Van. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. PT. Pradnya Paramita, Bandung, 2001.

Attamimi, A Hamid S. “Teori Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Suatu Sisi Ilmu Pengetahuan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Yang Menjelaskan Dan Menjernihkan Pemahaman,” 1992.

Friedmann, Wolfgang, and Muhamad Arifin. “Teori Dan Filsafat Hukum I: Telaah Kritis Atas Teori-Teori Hukum.” -, 1990.

Gandhi, L M. “Harmonisasi Hukum Menuju Hukum Yang Responsif.” Makalah, Yang Disampaikan Pada Pidato Pengukuhan Ru Besar Tetap Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 1995.

Irwan. “Metode Penelitian Hukum,” n.d.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique Of Pure Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Lihat Juga David Hume, A Treatise Of Human Nature, The Floating Press, Auckland, 2009, 2009.

Kusnu Goesniadhie Slamet. Harmonisasi Hukum Dalam Perspektif Perundang-Undangan; Lex Specialis Suatu Masalah. JP Books, Surabaya, 2006.

Lubis, Ikhsan, Tarsisius Murwadji, Mahmul Siregar, Detania Sukarja, Robert Robert, Dedi Harianto, and Mariane Magda Ketaren. “Comparison of Civil Law Regarding The Implementation of Cyber Notary in Countries With Common Law and Civil Law Traditions.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 10, no. 1 (2022).

Manan, Bagir. Hukum Positif Indonesia: Satu Kajian Teoritik. FH UII Press, 2004.

Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. “Antinomi Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Review 1, no. 3 (2015): 316–36.

Nasution, Adnan Buyung. “Bantuan Hukum Di Indonesia, LP3ES, Jakarta,” 2008.

Norrie, Alan. “From Critical to Socio-Legal Studies: Three Dialectics in Search of a Subject.” Social & Legal Studies 9, no. 1 (2000): 85–113.

Reksodiputro, Mardjono. “Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Jakarta: Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan Dan Pengabdian Hukum.” Universitas Indonesia, 1997.

“Results of Interview with Erry Meta, Law Office “Erry Meta. SH. MH & Partners, Surabaya, Monday, 27 June 2022, Time 10.30 WIB,” n.d.

Safudin, Endrik. “Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum.” Malang: Setara Press, 2017.

———. “Pengantar Ilmu Hukum.” Malang: Setara Press, 2020.

Slamet, Kusnu Goesniadhie. “Harmonisasi Hukum Dalam Perspektif Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Universitas Islam Indonesia (Islamic University of Indonesia) 11, no. 27 (2004): 82–96. https://doi.org/doi:10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss27.art8.

Syafruddin, Syafruddin. “Settlement of Juvenile Offenders Based on Restorative Justice.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 10, no. 3 (2022): 571–80.

Undang-Undang. “Lihat Pasal 8 Ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan,” n.d.

Wantu, Fence M. “Antinomi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim.” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 19, no. 3 (2007).

Zulaidi. Manfaat Pelaksanaan Bantuan Hukum Bagi Tersangka/Terdakwa Dalam Usaha Mencari Keadilan. Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2011.

Published

2023-04-12

How to Cite

Kafrawi, R. M., Mohammad Zamroni, & Marsal, A. P. (2023). Harmonization between Investigators and Advocates in the Law Enforcement Process. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i1.1174