The Positive Fictional Principle After the Implementation of The Job Creation Law: A Prophetic Legal Paradigm
Keywords:
Job Creation Law, Positive Fictional Principle, Prophetic LawAbstract
The positive fictitious principle in the Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (CK Law) exists to facilitate investment and simplify licensing. However, the provisions in the CK Law, which exclude the role of the Administrative Court in fictitious applications have the potential to cause injustice and legal uncertainty in society. That research focuses on examining the positive fictitious principle's existence after the CK Law's enactment in the paradigm of prophetic law. The paradigm of prophetic regulation was chosen in this study as an effort to explore the theological (divine) and human dimensions in positive fictitious formulations as in CK Law. This research is a normative legal type of research with a concept and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that in terms of the three aspects of prophetic law, namely transcendence, liberation, and humanization, the provisions of the CK Law, which no longer involve the role of the Administrative Court and have not issued Presidential Regulations regarding positive fiction can cause uncertainty and injustice in society. That makes the substance of the prophetic law in the positive fictitious provisions in the CK Law not be realized optimally. Orientation based on the prophetic legal paradigm in regulating the positive fictitious principle after regulation in the CK Law, according to the author, can be done by revising the positive fictitious provisions in the CK Law by returning the competence of the State Administrative Court.
Downloads
References
Absori, Et.all, Paradigma Hukum Profetik: Ragam Paradigma Menuju Hukum Berketuhanan, (1st ed, CV Genta Fisa Utama, Yogyakarta, 2018).
Diantha, I Made Pasek, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, (Prenada media Group, Jakarta, 2016).
Epstein, Richard, The Dubious Morality of Modern Administrative Law, (Rowman & Littlefield, Maryland, 2020).
Fukuyama, Francis, Identity: The Demand For Dignity and The Politics of Resentment, (1st ed., Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, London, 2018).
Mawardi, Irvan, Paradigma Baru PTUN: Respon Peradilan Administrasi Terhadap Demokratisasi, (1st ed, Thafa Media, Bantul, 2016).
Philipus M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Di Indonesia, (Peradaban Surabaya, 2007).
Ridwan Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, (13th ed. Rajawali Pres, Jakarta, 2018).
Simanjuntak, Enrico, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Tranformasi Dan Refleksi, (1st ed, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2018).
Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Omnibus Law Sebagai Teknik Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Peluang Adopsi Dan Tantangannya Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9, no. 1 (April 27, 2020): 17. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.389.
Anggreany Arief, Rizki Ramadani. “Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Konsep Dasar Perseroan Terbatas.” Al Adalah 6, no. 2 (2021): 110.
Anzhar Ishal Afryand dan Sapriya. “Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Melalui Pusat Studi Pancasila Sebagai Upaya Penguatan Ideologi Bangsa Bagi Generasi Muda (Studi Kasus Di Pusat Studi Pancasila Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta).” Untirta Civic Education Journal 3, no. 2 (2018): 30–42. https://doi.org/10.16143/j.cnki.1001-9928.2018.01.002.
Arniti, Ni Komang Ayu, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Penyelesaian Permohonan Fiktif Positif Untuk Mendapatkan Keputusan Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 1, no. 8 (2019): 265–70.
Asep Saepudin Jahar, Raju Moh Hazmi, Nurul Adhha. “Construction of Legal Justice, Certainty, and Benefits in the Supreme Court Decision Number 46P/HUM/2018.” Cita Hukum 9, no. 1 (2021): 162.
Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Friedrich Carl von Savigny Tentang Hukum: Hukum Sebagai Manifestasi Jiwa Bangsa.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (July 7, 2020): 201–36. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.201-236.
Deffains, Bruno, and Claude Fluet. “Social Norms and Legal Design.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 36, no. 1 (August 14, 2019): 139–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewz016.
Duke, George. “Law’s Normative Point.” Law and Philosophy 38, no. 1 (February 2019): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-018-9334-8.
-Efendi, A’An, and Fradhana Putra Disantara. “Post Conditionally Unconstitutional of Job Creation Law: Quo Vadis Legal Certainty?” Yuridika 37, no. 2 (2022): 329–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i2.33364.
Elvlyn, Elvlyn, and Delpedro Marhaen. “Pengaruh Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Digitalisasi UMKM Di Tengah Pandemi.” Justisi 8, no. 2 (2022): 82–94. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v8i2.1707.
Harding, Andrew. “Theories of Law and Development.” Asian Journal of Social Science 46, no. 4–5 (September 28, 2018): 421–44. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-04604003.
Hidayat, Arif, and Zaenal Arifin. “Politik Hukum Legislasi Sebagai Socio-Equilibrium Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 4, no. 2 (2019): 147–59. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1654.
Irfani, Nurfaqih. “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Pesterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 17, no. 3 (2020): 305. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.711.
Irvansyah, Andika Risqi. “KEDUDUKAN HUKUM KEPUTUSAN FIKTIF POSITIF SEJAK PENGUNDANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA.” Jurnal APHTN-HAN 1, no. 2 (2022): 210. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.213-236.1.
Khudzaifah Dimyati, Haedar Nashir, Elviandri, Absori, Kelik Wardiono, Arief Budiono. “Indonesia as a Legal Welfare State: A Prophetic-Transcendental Basis.” Heliyon 7, no. 8 (2021): 1–8.
Mailinda Eka Yuniza, Melodia Puji Inggarwati. “Peluang Dan Tantangan Penerapan Keputusan Fiktif Positif Setelah Diundangkannya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal de Jure 9, no. 2 (2021): 114–29.
Prawiranegara, Khalid. “Implementasi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Pada Pemerintahan Kabupaten Dompu.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 6, no. 3 (2021): 591–604. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss3.art11.
Rokilah Rokilah, Sulasno. “Penerapan Asas Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2021): 179–90.
Safitri, Erna Dwi, and Nabitatus Sa’adah. “Penerapan Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2021): 34–45.
Saiya, Aprillia Jultje, Saartje Sarah Alfons, and Heillen Martha Yosephine Tita. “Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 6 (2021): 619.
Santoso, Hari Agus. “Efektifitas Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Peningkatan Investasi.” Jurnal Hukum Positum 6, no. 2 (2021): 254–72.
Suryati, Ramanata Disurya, and Layang Sardana. “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Omnibus Law Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Simbur Cahaya 28, no. 1 (2021): 97–111. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/sc.v28i2.902.
Susanto, Sri Nurhari. “Komponen, Konsep Dan Pendekatan Hukum Administrasi Negara.” Administrative Law & Governance Journal 4, no. 1 (2021): 144–57.
Syamsuddin, M., ed. Ilmu Hukum Profetik: Gagasan Awal, Landasan Kefilsafatan, Dan Kemungkinan Penerapannya Di Era Postmodern. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2013.
Syaripuddin, Said. “Maslahat as Considerations of Islamic Law in View Imam Malik.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam Volume 4, no. 1 (2020): 1–23.
Zaid, Zaid, Farouk Aisha Dawaki, and Sabit Kazeem Ololade. “Should the State Control Tariffs?” Journal of Governance and Public Policy 8, no. 1 (2021): 22–36. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.811340.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Edi Pranoto, Kukuh Sudarmanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)
