Renewal of the Criminal Justice System Through the Constante Justitie Principle That Guarantees Justitiabelen's Satisfaction
Keywords:
Updates, System, Criminal Justice, Principle, Justitiabellen.Abstract
The Principle of Constante Justitie, or the principle of a simple, fast, and light trial, is intended so that handling cases can be resolved in a short time. It does not need to take a long time. The problem in this paper is: (1). how is the application of the Constante Justitie principle or the simple, fast, and low-cost principle as expected by justitiabellen? (2). How to renew the criminal justice system through the principle of Constante Justitie, which can guarantee justitiabellen satisfaction. This research is normative juridical research, namely legal research that aims to find methods, norms, or das sollen. The results showed that the application of the principles of justice, speed, and light costs that guarantee justitiabellen satisfaction has not been following the mandate of laws and regulations. The renewal of the criminal justice system, especially the Principle of Constante Justitie, which can guarantee justitiabellen satisfaction, has now been pursued by the Supreme Court by issuing various regulations such as the Supreme Court Rules or PERMA or Supreme Court Circulars or SEMA, but it has not been successful.Downloads
References
Books
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. 8th ed. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2016.
Shidarta. Moralitas Profesi Hukum: Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berpikir. Refika Aditama, 2006.
Journal and other scientific reference
Abidin, Zainal. “Inkorporasi Hak-Hak Fair Trial Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.†Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia 15, no. 1 (2022): 44–69.
Djatmiko, Wahju Prijo. “Paradigma Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Yang Responsif Dalam Perspektif Teori JH Merryman Tentang Strategi Pembangunan Hukum.†Arena Hukum 11, no. 2 (2018): 415–33.
Fendri, Azmi. “Perbaikan Sistem Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2011): 5.
Hartini, Sri. “Kajian Tentang Kemandirian Lembaga Kepolisian Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pada Era Reformasi.†Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 1 (2010).
Herawati, Netty. “Implikasi Mediasi Dalam Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri Terhadap Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, Dan Biaya Ringan.†Perspektif 16, no. 4 (2011): 227. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v16i4.85.
Ocarina, Majolica Fae, and Ronaldo Sanjaya. “Eksistensi E-Court Untuk Mewujudkan Efisiensi Dan Efektivitas Pada Sistem Peradilan Indonesia Di Tengah Covid-19.†Jurnal Syntax Transformation 2, no. 4 (2021): 496–507.
Putra, Angga. “Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Melalui Penataan Administrasi Peradilan.†Lex Crimen 4, no. 3 (2015): 50.
Rahman, Fathor. “Perbandingan Tujuan Hukum Indonesia, Jepang Dan Islam.†Khazanah Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 32–40. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v2i1.7737.
Rosdalina, Rosdalina, and Edi Gunawan. “Penerapan Asas Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama.†Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam 7, no. 2 (2017): 342–65.
Rosy, Kadek Oldy, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, and Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini. “Peran Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Adat Setra Karang Rupit Di Pengadilan Negeri Singaraja Kelas 1B.†Ganesha Law Review 2, no. 2 (2020): 155–66.
Wahab, Yasser S, Julianto J J Kalalo, and Lisa Mery. “Penggunaan Media E-Mail Sebagai Sarana Beracara Contante Justitie Pada Pengadilan Di Indonesia.†Hasanuddin Law Review 1, no. 2 (2015): 194–209.
Waskito, Achmad Budi. “Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Integrasi.†Jurnal Daulat Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 288.
Wiarti, July. “Tindakan Tembak Mati Terhadap Terduga Teroris Berdasarkan Perspektif Proses Hukum Yang Adil.†Lex Renaissance 4, no. 1 (2019): 1–24.
Yorisca, Yenny. “Pembangunan Hukum Yang Berkelanjutan: Langkah Penjaminan Hukum Dalam Mencapai Pembangunan Nasional Yang Berkelanjutan.†Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 17, no. 1 (2020): 100.
Regulations
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 tentang Pedoman Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Penyelesaian Perkara di Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama dan Tingkat Banding pada 4 (Empat) Lingkungan Peradilan
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Fence M. Wantu, Jufryanto Puluhulawa, Anis H. Bajrektarevic, Mellisa Towadi, Vifi Swarianata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)
