Problematic of Implementation of Electronic GMS on Deeds Made by Notaries

https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i3.1106

Authors

  • Syifa Rana Tsary Muhammadiyah Surakarta University
  • Absori Absori Muhammadiyah Surakarta University
  • Aidul Fitriciada Azhari Muhammadiyah Surakarta University
  • Kelik Wardiono Muhammadiyah Surakarta University
  • Silaas Oghenemaro Emovwodo Brunei Darussalam University

Keywords:

Covid-19 Pandemic, E-GMS, Notaries, Relaas Deed

Abstract

The study reviewed the development of the digital era in the legal field, especially The Electronic General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), which is ruled by law. The problem formulation was how the electronic GMS, according to positive law in Indonesia, and how the impact on the notarial deed related to its implementation. The method used by the researcher was normative and library study based on the primary material (legislation), secondary material (scientific works, journals, books, documents, and other literature), and tertiary legal materials (legal dictionaries). The study results were that E-GMS is effective today, then regulated in Art 77 UUPT and PJOK Number 16/Pojk.04/2020, so that the Limited Liability Company members can carry out the GMS as usual without being physically present to break the chain of the Covid-19 pandemic. Although the e-GMS arrangements have been regulated in the legislation, the lex specialist derogat lex generalist principle cannot be ignored; article 16 paragraph (1) letter (m) and Article 18 UUJN are still prioritized so that the electronic deed of the GMS cannot be carried out or will resulting in the legal force of the proof being a private deed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Fuady, Munir. Perlindungan Pemegang Saham Minoritas. Bandung: CV. Utomo, 2005.

———. Perseroan Terbatas Paradigma Baru. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.

Hadikusuma, Hilman. Bahasa Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2005.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.

Khairandy, Ridwan. Pengantar Hukum Dagang, Cet. Ke-1. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2006.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Cet. Ke-13. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2000.

Purwosutjipto, H.M.N. Pengertian Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia 2: Bentuk-Bentuk Perusahaan. Cet. Ke-10. Jakarta: Djambatan, 2005.

Sembiring, Sentosa. Himpunan Perundang-Undangan Republik Indonesia Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektroni. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2009.

Sjaifurahman, and Habi Adjie. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2011.

Sudaryat. Legal Officer, Cet, Ke-I. Bandung: Oase Media, 2008.

Usman, Rachmadi. Dimensi Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Bandung: Alumni, 2004.

Waluyo, Bambang. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1991.

Widjaja, Gunawan. Tanggung Jawab Direksi Atas Kepailitan Perseroan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo, 2003.

Widjaya, I.G.A. Hukum Perusahaan, Cet. Ke-1. Jakarta: Kesaint Blanc, 2000.

Journals

Dewi, A.S.K. “Melekatkan Sidik Jari Penghadap, Dewi, A.S.K., Penyelenggaraan Rups Melalui Media Elektronik Terkait Kewajiban Notaris Melekatkan Sidik Jari Penghadap.†Arena Hukum Journal, no. 1 (2015). https://arenahukum.ub.ac.id/index.php/arena/article/view/197,

Dewi, M.N.K. “Kedudukan Hukum Akta Risalah Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (Rups) Melalui Media Elektronik.†Arena Hukum Journal 9, no. 1 (2016): 112–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2016.00901.7

Merlyani, D., A. Yahanan, and A. Trisaka. “Kewajiban Pembacaan Akta Otentik Oleh Notaris Di Hadapan Penghadap Dengan Konsep Cyber Notary.†Repertorium Journal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 9, no. 1 (2020): 36–47. http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/repertorium/article/view/358/244

Rossalina, Zainatun, Moh. Bakri, and Itta Andrijani. “Keabsahan Akta Notaris Yang Menggunakan Cyber Notary Sebagai Akta Otentik.†Jurnal Hukum, 2016. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1554

Seto, W. “Keabsahan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas Dengan Bukti Kehadiran Para Pemegang Saham Secara Online.†Repertorium Journal, no. 1 (2017). https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/repertorium/article/view/27820

Siagian, S. S. S. “Legalitas Cyber Notary Dan Tandatangan Dalam Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham.†Universitas Sumatra Utara, 2020. https://mkn.usu.ac.id/images/27.pdf

Talitha, B. D. “Keabsahan Penyelenggaraan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Secara Teleconference.†Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, 2021. http://repository.untag-sby.ac.id/7786/31/Uji plagiasi Bianda Dea Talitha 1311700081.pdf

Tsary, Syifa Rana. “Juridical Analysis of GMS Electronic Policy (E-GMS) on the Morality of Notary Responsibilities.†International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) 9, no. 12 (2022): 197–204. https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/4154/3659

Thesis:

Agustian, Erick. “Eksistensi Akta Risalah Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Yang Dibuat Notaris Dalam Kaitan Perubahan Anggaran Dasar Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor.209/K/Tun/2004).†Universitas Diponegoro, 2011

Wahyuni, Grace. “Keabsahan Tanda Tangan Elektronik RUPS Telekonferensi Berdasarkan UU No.40 Tahun 2007 Tentang PT Dan UU No.30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.†FH Universitas Indonesia, 2010.

Published

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Tsary, S. R., Absori, A., Azhari, A. F., Wardiono, K., & Emovwodo, S. O. (2022). Problematic of Implementation of Electronic GMS on Deeds Made by Notaries. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 10(3), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i3.1106