Complaint Authority for Constitutional Complaint by Indonesia’s Constitutional Court

Sri Warjiyati, Kayode Muhammed Ibrahim, Safrin Salam, Umar Faruq

Abstract


Constitutional Court will be able to provide protection for constitutional rights which will produce institutions that are able to provide answers to reforms. The presence of the Constitutional Court third amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which became the basis of Article 24C. The legitimacy of the Constitutional Court in a limited way is formulated, namely: to begin, to investigate legislation that violates the constitution, to adjudicate disputes over the power of state institutions vested with constitutional authority, and to adjudicate the dissolution of political parties and settlement, the four general election disputes. In the modern state administration discourse, it currently requires the Constitutional Court to expand the scope of its authority in relation to Constitutional Complaints or commonly referred to as Constitutional Complaints. The necessity of one of these powers can be seen in the number of state institutions that violate the constitutional rights of citizens through the actions of these institutions. However, the channel for this complaint still does not exist, only that currently exists in providing protection for the right of Constitutional Complaints to be protected through judicial review of the basic constitution as regulated in the constitution.


Keywords


Authority; Constitutional; Complaint;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashari, S. H. (2016). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/puu-xi/2013 Tentang Pemilihan Umum secara Serentak. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 4(1).

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2005) Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme. Jakarta: Konpress,.

Kusumo, B. A., & Jaelani, A. K. (2018). Mengagas Constitutional Complaint Dalam Konstitusi Indonesia Dan Politik Hukum Islam. Wacana Hukum, 24(1), 1-18.

Chakim, M. L. (2019). A Comparative Perspective on Constitutional Complaint: Discussing Models, Procedures, and Decisions. Const. Rev., 5, 96.

Durga, Das Basu. “Human Rights in Constitutionl Complain Ke Dalam UUD 1945 : Menuju Konstitusi Yang Lebih Demokratis.” Jurnal Konstitusi 4, no. 4 (2007).

Faiz, P. M. (2016). A Prospect and Challenges for Adopting Constitutional Complaint and Constitutional Question in the Indonesian Constitutional Court. Const. Rev., 2, 103.

Gárdos-Orosz, F. (2012). The Hungarian constitutional court in transition—from actio popularis to constitutional complaint. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 53(4), 302-315.

Arrsa, R. C., Ningtyas, A. P., & Sutanto, F. A. (2021). Legal Framework for The Establishment of a Local-Owned Banking Enterprise: Study in Batu City. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 9(2), 268-286.

MD, Mahfud. (2006) “Demokrasi Dan Konstitusi Di Indonesai.” Jurnalhukum.blogspot.

Mahfud, M. (2009). Rambu Pembatas dan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(4), 441-462.

Palguna, I., & Gede, D. (2017). Constitutional Complaint and the Protection of Citizens the Constitutional Rights. Const. Rev., 3, 1.

Palguna, I Gede. (2000) “Menabur Benih Konstitusional Complaing.” In Pengaduan Konstitusional Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara,.

Latuheru, P. M., Perdana, F. W., Irwan, I., Setiawan, B., & Sidartha, D. B. (2022). Urgensi constitutional Question dan constitutional Complaint, Arti Penting Pemberian Kewenangan Tersebut Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 3(2), 351-357.

Safrin Salam, S. H., Nurwita Ismail, S. H., Faharudin, S. H., Nuragifah, S. H., Silambi, E. D., SH, M., ... & MH, C. (2020). Perkembangan Filsafat Hukum Kontemporer. Zifatama Jawara.

Salam, S. (2019). Rekonstruksi Paradigma Filsafat Ilmu: Studi Kritis Terhadap Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Ilmu. Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 18(2), 885-896.

Simamora, J. (2015). Comparison of constitutional court authority between Indonesia and South Korea. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 15(3), 331-338.

Siregar, A. R. M. (2018). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945. Jurnal Hukum Responsif, 5(5), 100-108.

Soehalim, J. A. (2020). Pengembangan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penerapan Pengaduan Konstitusional di Indonesia. Lex Administratum, 8(1).

Subiyanto, A. E. (2016). Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Melalui Pengaduan Konstitusional. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(5), 707-732.

Sugawara, Etsuko, and Hiroshi Nikaido. (2014)“Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Di Indonesia Yang Merajalela.” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 58, no. 12: 7250–7257.

Ülvan, N. C. (2013). Constitutional Complaint and Individual Complaint in Turkey. Ankara Bar Review, 6(2), 179-186.

Wahid, Abdurrahman. (2005) “Membangun Demokrasi.” Lex Jurnalica 3, no. 1: 85.

Wardhana, Allan Fatchan Gani. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Bagi Warga Negara Penganut/Penghayat Kepercayaan Dan Gagasan Constitutional Complaint.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. (2018): 10–27.

Yanti, H. (2018). Gagasan constitutional Complaint Sebagai kewenangan Baru Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional. Wajah Hukum, 2(2), 185-198.

Zoelva, H. (2012). Constitutional Complaint Constitutional Question and Protection of Citizen’s Constitutional Rights’. Jurnal Media Hukum, 19, 152-65.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i2.1070

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Sri Warjiyati, Kayode Muhammed Ibrahim, Safrin Salam, Umar Faruq

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web
Analytics Jurnal IUS statcounter

https://ix0.org/toc/2477-815X

View full indexing services.