THE EXECUTORIAL FORCE OF RULING OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AND THE IMPLICATIONS IN PRACTICE

https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v2i4.164

Authors

Abstract

This thesis entitled force executorial administrative court ruling and the implications in practice, discusses the mechanism of execution of the decision of the Administrative Court, the obstacles in the process of execution of the decision of the Administrative Court and the efforts that are made to the administrative court ruling that is not carried by the official / TUN Agency . This type of research is normative and assisted legal research / materials reinforced with empirical law in order to simplify and refine the analysis . The approach used is legislation approach , conceptual approach , approach cases , comparative approach . So that research results can be drawn that the mechanism of execution of court decisions TUN namely : Decision inkracht , after 60 working days the defendant did not perform its obligations , the decision has no legal force again and turns 90 working days of the obligation is not performed , the plaintiff filed a petition to the President of the Court order the court ordered defendant to implement the decision of the court , the defendant is not willing to implement the decision inkracht forceful measures imposed in the form of payment of a sum of money and forced or administrative sanctions and announced in local print media by him, since non-compliance of the court and the chairman shall submit to the President as the highest authority for TUN ordered officials to implement the court’s decision . So there was a bottleneck in the execution of the ruling Justice TUN namely : Verdict Amar , execution barriers TUN official verdict is due to the position of Regional Chief Political Officer , execution barriers TUN official verdict caused the accused are officials who received the delegation of authority false , barriers of understanding TUN officials the State ‘s theory of law and AAUPB , technical barriers , barriers juridical ; Barriers related to legal principles , barriers in terms of the limited authority of judges , Barriers due to changes in the system of regional autonomy , Barriers due to noncompliance TUN officials and effort to do the administrative court ruling are not carried by the official / TUN Agency as criminal Attempts by the police to file a criminal report with the basic law 216 of the Criminal Code and civil efforts filed a lawsuit in state court using Article 1365 of the Civil Code as the basis for a lawsuit .
Keywords : executorial power , Mechanisms , Barriers and Efforts .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Supandi, “Kepatuhan Pejabat Dalam Menaati Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negaraâ€, Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sumatera Utara, (Medan, 2005),

Supandi, “Problematika Penerapan Eksekusi Putusan Peradilan TUN Terhadap Pejabat TUN Daerahâ€, makalah disampaikan pada Workshop tentang Penerapan Eksekusi

Putusan PTUN Dalam Kaitannya dengan Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah, LPP-HAN bekerjasama dengan KNH, (Jakarta, 2004),

Arifin Marpaung, “Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Melalui Upaya Paksaâ€, (Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga Surabaya, 2010),

Paulus Effendi Lotulung, “Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia Dibandingkan Dengan Peradilan Administrasi Yang Berlaku Di Berbagai Negaraâ€, dalam Mengakji Kembali Pokok-Pokok Pikiran Pembentukan Perdailan Tata Usaha Negara, (LPP-HAN, Jakarta, 2003),

Puslitbang Hukum Dan Peradilan Badan Litbang Kumdil Mahkamah Agung RI, “Eksekutabilitas Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negaraâ€, Laporan Penelitian Balitbang Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI, (Jakarta, 2010),

Admosudirjo Prayudi, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Edisi revisi ilmu administrasi, (Ghalia, Jakarta 1995)

Indroharto, Usaha Memahami Undang-undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Buku 1 Beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara, (Sinar Harapan,Jakarta 1996)

Harbet A. Simon, Prilaku Administrasi (Terjemahan), Bina Aksara, Jakarta, 1984)

Syarifin Pipin dan Jubaedah, Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia, (Pustaka Setia, Bandung 2005)

Sulistyo sebagaimana mengutip Lintong Oloan Siahaan, selengkapnya dalam Sulistyo, Penerapan Sistem Peradilan 2 (dua) tingkat untuk Peradilan TUN : Studi Tentang UU. No. 5 Tahun 2004 Perubahan Kedua UU. No. 14 Tahun 1985 Tentang Mahkamah Agung, (Sekolah Pasca Sarjana USU, 2007)

Yos Johan Utama, Membangun Peradilan TUN yang Berwibawa, Disampaikan pada Upacara Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar Dalam Ilmu Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro (Semarang, 4 Februari 2010)

Supandi, Kepatuhan Pejabat Dalam mentaati Putusan Pengadilan TUN, Disertasi, Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Sumatera Utara, (Medan 2005)

Published

2014-04-19

How to Cite

Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo, F. A. J. &. (2014). THE EXECUTORIAL FORCE OF RULING OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AND THE IMPLICATIONS IN PRACTICE. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v2i4.164

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN

Section

Articles
Copyright & Licensing

The authors hold the copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. How ever the author should affirming that the article is their original work should accompany the article via online submission form. Authors are permitted to share a Preprint of their article anywhere at any time. Link Declaration of originality (PDF)