CONSUMERS’ LEGAL PROTECTION CERTAINTY VIS-À-VIS THE APPLICATION OF STANDARD CONTRACTS

https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v1i1.152

Authors

Abstract

The consumer protection is an important aspect to ensure the legal certainty for consumers
in using products of marketed businesses. Orientations of entrepreneurs is emphasize the
practicality of achieving profits to encourage the growth of unhealthy trade practices with the
instrument of standard contract application as a basis of law relationship among the economic
actors. The nature of standard contract that is identical to the principle “take it or leave it†is a
clear example of the difference of position that leads to a form of exploitation of consumers and form the opposition to the principles of the agreement in general. The proliferation of standard contract application in the community is an implication of freedom of contract principle that applied to the restrictions set forth in Article 1337 and Article 1339 of Civil Code. Although restrictions on the principle of freedom of contract has been regulated strictly, the application of standard contracts that happened in the community tend to be opposed to the principle of freedom of contract itself, especially in terms of the substance and implementation of the contract.
This situation at last encourages the consumers protection both preventive and repressive legal protection. The mechanism of consumer dispute resolution is divided into three systems; consist of the peaceful settlement; settlement of disputes through public justice, or the settlement of disputes outside the courts through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK). The dispute resolution procedure through BPSK is divided into three stages namely, complain phase, trial phase and decision phase, while the court procedure is divided into stages of proposing a lawsuit, the reading a lawsuit by the plaintiff, the defendant answers on the plaintiff’s lawsuit, replik, duplik, and the examination of evidence, conclusions, and the judge’s decision
Keywords: Consumer Protection, Standard Contract, Transaction Law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku

Ahmadi Miru, Hukum Kontrak (Perancangan Kontrak), Jakarta, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007.

Ahmadi Miru & Sutarman Yodo, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008.

AZ Nasution., Pengantar Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Cetakan II, Jakarta, Daya Widya, 2002.

Celina Tri Siwi Kristiyanti, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2008.

Emerson Yuntho, Class Action Sebuah Pengantar, www.elsam.or.id, diakses pada tanggal 11 November 2011.

Herlien Budiono, Asas Keseimbangan Bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia (Hukum Perjanjian Berlandaskan Asas-Asas

Wigati Indonesia), Bandung, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.

Inosentius Samsul, “Perlindungan Konsumen: Kemungkinan Penerapan

Tanggung Jawab Mutlakâ€, (Tesis, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2004).

Ismail Saleh, Hukum dan Ekonomi, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1990.

Kurniawan dan Abdul Wahab, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Prosedur

Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Di Indonesiaâ€, Jurnal Hukum Jatiswara, Volume 23, Nomor 2, (Juli 2008).

Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, Aneka Hukum Bisnis, Bandung, Alumni, 2005.

Nick Doren, Gugatan Legal Standing Dan Class Action Dalam Hukum

Perlindungan Konsumen, http://catatanlepasnick. blogspot.com, diakses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2011.

Ribka Djula, â€Perjanjian Waralaba Sebagai Sarana Alih Teknologiâ€,(Tesis Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Mataram, 2010).

Sahnan, “Kerusakan Sumber Daya Alam (Hutan) dan Penegakannya,

Studi di Kabupaten Lombok Baratâ€,

Jurnal Hukum Jatiswara,Volume 23, Nomor 2, (Juli 2008). Konsumen khususnya pada aspek penyelesaian sengketa konsumen.

Konsumen hendaknya lebih aktif dan teliti dalam memanfaatkan suatu produk sehingga mampu terhindar dari kerugian-kerugian yang tidak diinginkan dan mampu melindungi dirinya sendiri. Selain itu juga, kepada para pelaku usaha diharapkan memasarkan produk yang lebih mengedepankan kualitas bukan kuantitas semata sehingga mampu mendukung upaya perlindungan konsumen.

Salim HS, Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW), Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2003.

Sidharta, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta, PT. Grasindo, 2006.

Soerjono Soekanto, Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 1980.

Subekti & R, Tjitrosudibio, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramita,1984.

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, Kebebasan Berkontrak Dan Perlindungan Yang Seimbang Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank Di

Indonesia, Jakarta, Institut Bankir Indonesia, 1993.

Peraturan Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Tambahan Lembaran Negara

Republik Indonesia Nomor 3821.

Indonesia, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1Tahun 2002 tentang Acara Gugatan Perwakilan Kelompok.

Published

2013-04-20

How to Cite

Bagiartha, I. P. P. (2013). CONSUMERS’ LEGAL PROTECTION CERTAINTY VIS-À-VIS THE APPLICATION OF STANDARD CONTRACTS. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v1i1.152